Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorBarge-Caballero, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorCastel-Lavilla, María A.
dc.contributor.authorAlmenar-Bonet, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGarrido-Bravo, Iris P.
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Jiménez, Juan F.
dc.contributor.authorRangel-Sousa, Diego
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Costello, José
dc.contributor.authorSegovia-Cubero, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFarrero-Torres, Marta
dc.contributor.authorLambert Rodríguez, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorCrespo-Leiro, María Generosa
dc.contributor.authorHervás-Sotomayor, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorPortolés-Ocampo, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Sellés, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorDe la Fuente-Galán, Luis
dc.contributor.authorRábago, Gregorio
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Vílchez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMirabet, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorMuñiz, Javier
dc.contributor.authorBarge-Caballero, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T09:52:15Z
dc.date.available2020-10-28T09:52:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-30
dc.identifier.citationBarge-Caballero G, Castel-Lavilla MA, Almenar-Bonet L, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with or without simultaneous intra-aortic balloon pump support as a direct bridge to heart transplantation: results from a nationwide Spanish registry. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 29(5):670-677es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1569-9285
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/26566
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] OBJECTIVES To investigate the potential clinical benefit of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). METHODS We studied 169 patients who were listed for urgent HT under VA-ECMO support at 16 Spanish institutions from 2010 to 2015. The clinical outcomes of patients under simultaneous IABP support (n = 73) were compared to a control group of patients without IABP support (n = 96). RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the IABP and control groups with regard to the cumulative rates of transplantation (71.2% vs 81.2%, P = 0.17), death during VA-ECMO support (20.6% vs 14.6%, P = 0.31), transition to a different mechanical circulatory support device (5.5% vs 5.2%, P = 0.94) or weaning from VA-ECMO support due to recovery (2.7% vs 0%, P = 0.10). There was a higher incidence of bleeding events in the IABP group (45.2% vs 25%, P = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02–4.67). In-hospital postoperative mortality after HT was 34.6% in the IABP group and 32.5% in the control group (P = 0.80). One-year survival after listing for urgent HT was 53.3% in the IABP group and 52.2% in the control group (log rank P = 0.75). Multivariate adjustment for potential confounders did not change this result (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.56–1.58). CONCLUSIONS In our study, simultaneous IABP therapy in transplant candidates under VA-ECMO support did not significantly reduce morbidity or mortality.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford Academices_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivz155es_ES
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery following peer review.es_ES
dc.subjectHeart transplantationes_ES
dc.subjectExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationes_ES
dc.subjectIntra-aortic balloon pumpes_ES
dc.titleVenoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with or without Simultaneous Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support as a Direct Bridge to Heart Transplantation: Results from a Nationwide Spanish Registryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgeryes_ES
UDC.volume29es_ES
UDC.issue5es_ES
UDC.startPage670es_ES
UDC.endPage677es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem