Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem
Is myofascial release therapy cost-effective when compared with manual therapy to treat workers’ mechanical neck pains?
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Fuentes, Iván | |
dc.contributor.author | De-Toro, Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Fuentes, Gustavo | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, Iris Machado de | |
dc.contributor.author | Meijide-Faílde, Rosa | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuentes Boquete, Isaac Manuel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-05T11:45:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rodríguez-Fuentes I, De Toro FJ, Rodríguez-Fuentes G, de Oliveira IM, Meijide-Faílde R, Fuentes-Boquete IM. Is myofascial release therapy cost-effective when compared with manual therapy to treat workers’ mechanical neck pains? J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Sep;43(7):683-690. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0161-4754 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-6586 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2183/26334 | |
dc.description.abstract | [Abstract] Objective: The aim of this study was to do a cost-benefit analysis of myofascial release therapy (MRT) compared to manual therapy (MT) for treating occupational mechanical neck pain. Methods: Variables regarding the outcomes of the intervention were intensity of neck pain, cervical disability, quality of life, craniovertebral angle, and ranges of cervical motion. Costs were assessed based on a social perspective using diary costs. Between-groups differences in average cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility ratios were assessed using bootstrap parametric techniques. The economic cost-benefit evaluation was with regard to an experimental parallel group study design. There were 59 participants. Results: Myofascial released therapy showed significant improvement over MT for cervical mobility (side bending, rotation, and craniovertebral angle). The total cost of MRT was approximately 20% less ( $519.81; 95% confidence interval, $1193.67 to $100.31) than that of MT, although this was not statistically significant. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios showed that MRT could be associated with lower economic costs. Conclusion: With probabilities of 93.9% and 95.8%, MRT seems to be cost-effective for treating mechanical neck pain without the need to add any additional cost to obtain a better clinical benefit. Consequently, we believe it could be included in the clinical practice guidelines of different Spanish health care institutions. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.037 | es_ES |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Cost-benefit analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Neck pain | es_ES |
dc.subject | Musculoskeletal manipulations | es_ES |
dc.title | Is myofascial release therapy cost-effective when compared with manual therapy to treat workers’ mechanical neck pains? | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.access | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | es_ES |
dc.date.embargoEndDate | 2021-09-12 | es_ES |
dc.date.embargoLift | 2021-09-12 | |
UDC.journalTitle | Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics | es_ES |
Ficheiros no ítem
Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)
-
GI-TCMR - Artigos [131]
-
INIBIC-TCMR - Artigos [102]