Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorGutak, J.M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuban, D.A.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-23T12:21:11Z
dc.date.available2014-09-23T12:21:11Z
dc.date.issued2013es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCadernos do laboratorio xeolóxico de Laxe, 2013, 37: 163-180. ISSN: 0213-4497es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0213-4497es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/12583
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Catastrophes were common in the geologic past, but their distinction from other events is necessary. Besides magnitude (strength), scales of events are important in a solution of this task. Several examples, which involve Late Paleozoic and Quaternary megafloods, Hadean and Phanerozoic extraterrestrial impacts, and Phanerozoic mass extinctions, ensure that scaling by spatial extent and diversity of consequences facilitates tracing the boundary between catastrophes and “ordinary” events. This boundary, however, is dynamic and its position depends on our subjective needs. Considerations of the geologic past should not mix catastrophes of different scales. The event analysis helps to avoid such a pitfall, and, therefore, it should be preferred to neocatastrophism in modern geoscience.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.subjectCatastrophees_ES
dc.subjectEventes_ES
dc.subjectMegafloodes_ES
dc.subjectExtraterrestrial impactes_ES
dc.subjectMass extinctiones_ES
dc.titleCatastrophes versus events in the geologic past: how does the scale matter?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem