Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registry

Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/41103
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Coleccións
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registryAutor(es)
Data
2024-09-06Cita bibliográfica
Cabanas-Grandío P, González-Melchor L, Caamaño MV, Windcheid EF-O, Babarro EG, Bobín OD, Portela MP, Delgado OP, Teja JE, Feijoo MG, Freire E, Díaz Castro O, Muñiz García J, García-Seara J, González-Juataney C. Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registry. J Clin Med (Basel). 2024;13(17):5283.
Resumo
[Abstract] Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is pivotal in the clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent thromboembolic events, but information about the quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction in relation with the anticoagulant treatment is limited. Methods: REGUEIFA is a prospective, observational, and multicentre study that included patients with AF treated by cardiologists. We included patients treated with VKAs or DOACs. The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire evaluated QoL, and the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) questionnaire investigated patient satisfaction with OAC. Results: A total of 904 patients were included (532 on VKA and 372 on DOACs). A total of 846 patients completed the EQ-5D questionnaire, with results significantly worse in patients on VKAs than on DOACs: more mobility limitations (37.6% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001), more restriction in usual activities (24.7% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.026), more pain/discomfort (31.8% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.015), a lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score (66.4 ± 16.21 vs. 70.8 ± 15.6), and a lower EQ-D5 index (0.79 ± 0.21 vs. 0.85 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, VKA treatment was not an independent factor towards worse EQ-5D results. Also, 738 patients completed the ACTS questionnaire, and burden and profit scores were lower in patients on VKAs than for DOACs (52.1 ± 8.4 vs. 55.5 ± 6.8, p < 0.001 and 11.1 ± 2.4 vs. 11.8 ± 2.6, p < 0.001, respectively). The negative impact score was higher for VKAs than for DOACs (1.8 ± 1.02 vs. 1.6 ± 0.99, p < 0.001), with a general positive impact score lower for VKAs than for DOACs (3.6 ± 0.96 vs. 3.8 ± 1.02, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients on VKA have more comorbidity and worse EQ-5D and VAS scores than those on DOACs. VKA has a greater burden and higher negative impact on the patient’s life than DOACs.
Palabras chave
Quality of life
Patient satisfaction
Atrial fibrillation
Oral anticoagulation
Patient satisfaction
Atrial fibrillation
Oral anticoagulation
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2077-0383