Skip navigation
  •  Home
  • UDC 
    • Getting started
    • RUC Policies
    • FAQ
    • FAQ on Copyright
    • More information at INFOguias UDC
  • Browse 
    • Communities
    • Browse by:
    • Issue Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
  • Help
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Login
  •  English 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Universitaria de Enfermaría
  • Investigación (EUEAC)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Universitaria de Enfermaría
  • Investigación (EUEAC)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registry

Thumbnail
View/Open
Cabanas_Health-Related_2024.pdf (477.9Kb)
Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/41103
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Collections
  • Investigación (EUEAC) [63]
Metadata
Show full item record
Title
Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registry
Author(s)
Cabanas-Grandío, Pilar
González-Melchor, Laila
Vázquez Caamaño, María
Fernández-Obanza Windcheid, Emiliano
González Babarro, Eva
Durán-Bobín, Olga
Piñeiro Portela, Miriam
Prada-Delgado, Óscar
Elices-Teja, Juliana
Gutiérrez Feijoo, Mario
Freire, Evaristo
Díaz-Castro, Óscar
Muñiz, Javier
García-Seara, Javier
González-Juanatey, Carlos
Date
2024-09-06
Citation
Cabanas-Grandío P, González-Melchor L, Caamaño MV, Windcheid EF-O, Babarro EG, Bobín OD, Portela MP, Delgado OP, Teja JE, Feijoo MG, Freire E, Díaz Castro O, Muñiz García J, García-Seara J, González-Juataney C. Health-related quality of life and satisfaction in atrial fibrillation patients on anticoagulant therapy: differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants: results from the multicentre REGUEIFA registry. J Clin Med (Basel). 2024;13(17):5283.
Abstract
[Abstract] Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is pivotal in the clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent thromboembolic events, but information about the quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction in relation with the anticoagulant treatment is limited. Methods: REGUEIFA is a prospective, observational, and multicentre study that included patients with AF treated by cardiologists. We included patients treated with VKAs or DOACs. The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire evaluated QoL, and the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) questionnaire investigated patient satisfaction with OAC. Results: A total of 904 patients were included (532 on VKA and 372 on DOACs). A total of 846 patients completed the EQ-5D questionnaire, with results significantly worse in patients on VKAs than on DOACs: more mobility limitations (37.6% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001), more restriction in usual activities (24.7% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.026), more pain/discomfort (31.8% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.015), a lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score (66.4 ± 16.21 vs. 70.8 ± 15.6), and a lower EQ-D5 index (0.79 ± 0.21 vs. 0.85 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, VKA treatment was not an independent factor towards worse EQ-5D results. Also, 738 patients completed the ACTS questionnaire, and burden and profit scores were lower in patients on VKAs than for DOACs (52.1 ± 8.4 vs. 55.5 ± 6.8, p < 0.001 and 11.1 ± 2.4 vs. 11.8 ± 2.6, p < 0.001, respectively). The negative impact score was higher for VKAs than for DOACs (1.8 ± 1.02 vs. 1.6 ± 0.99, p < 0.001), with a general positive impact score lower for VKAs than for DOACs (3.6 ± 0.96 vs. 3.8 ± 1.02, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients on VKA have more comorbidity and worse EQ-5D and VAS scores than those on DOACs. VKA has a greater burden and higher negative impact on the patient’s life than DOACs.
Keywords
Quality of life
Patient satisfaction
Atrial fibrillation
Oral anticoagulation
 
Editor version
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175283
Rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2077-0383

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic DegreeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsResearch GroupAcademic Degree

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Send Feedback