Self-protection profiles of worth and academic goals in university students

Not available until 9999-99-99
Use this link to cite
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/35009Collections
- Investigación (FEDU) [936]
Metadata
Show full item recordTitle
Self-protection profiles of worth and academic goals in university studentsDate
2016-09-20Citation
Ferradás, M.d.M., Freire, C. & Núñez, J.C. Self-protection profiles of worth and academic goals in university students. Eur J Psychol Educ 32, 669–686 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0318-5
Referenced by
Cano, F., Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2018). Students’ self-worth protection and approaches to learning in higher education: predictors and consequences. Higher Education, 76, 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0215-0 Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2018). Motivation belief profiles in science: Links to classroom goal structures and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.003
Abstract
[Abstract] This work analyzes the possible existence of self-protection profiles based on a combination of self-handicapping (behavioral and claimed) strategies and defensive pessimism in university students. Similarly, the relationship between these profiles and academic goals (learning, performance-approach, performance-avoidance, and work-avoidance) is also examined. Nine hundred and forty university students participated in the study. Latent profile analysis identified six self-protection profiles of worth: the HS group (high in behavioral and claimed self-handicapping and in defensive pessimism); the LS group (low in behavioral and claimed self-handicapping and in defensive pessimism); the BSH/DP group (high in behavioral self-handicapping and defensive pessimism); the CSH group (high in claimed self-handicapping); the MSH group (moderate use of behavioral and claimed self-handicapping); and the HSH group (high in both types of self-handicapping). In terms of goal orientations, the LS and BSH/DP groups represented the most and least adaptive profiles, respectively. These results show the existence of a broader spectrum of self-worth protection profiles than that suggested by previous research in the university context. In addition, each of these profiles follows different motivational trajectories of achievement. The educational implications of these results are discussed.
Keywords
Self-protection profiles
Behavioral self-handicapping
Claimed self-handicapping
Defensive pessimism
Academic goals
University students
Behavioral self-handicapping
Claimed self-handicapping
Defensive pessimism
Academic goals
University students
Editor version
Rights
© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
2016
ISSN
0256-2928