Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorCancela, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorArias, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Romero, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorChouza-Insua, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorCudeiro, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-10T07:21:38Z
dc.date.available2023-07-10T07:21:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-18
dc.identifier.citationCancela Á, Arias P, Rodríguez-Romero B, Chouza-Insua M, Cudeiro J. Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H-reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: a controlled study. Physiol Rep. 2023 Jun;11(12):e15748.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2051-817X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/33303
dc.descriptionRandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Neurodynamic techniques have yielded good clinical results in the treatment of various pathologies. The objective of this study is to examine the short-term effects of neurodynamic techniques of the sciatic nerve on hip ROM (range of motion) and on the amplitude and latency of the soleus H-reflex and M-waves, in young asymptomatic subjects. In a double-blind controlled trial design, 60 young asymptomatic participants were randomly assigned into six groups with different levels of manipulation of the sciatic nerve. The passive straight leg raise test was used to evaluate the hip ROM amplitude. All evaluations were performed before, 1 min after, and 30 min after intervention. For each time-point, spinal and muscle excitability were also tested. ROM increased in all groups, but none of the treatment groups had superior effects than the group with no treatment. This means that ROM testing maneuvers increased ROM amplitude, with no add-on effect of the proposed neurodynamic techniques. Neurophysiological responses changed similarly in all groups, showing that the aftereffects were not intervention-specific. We observed a significant negative association between the change in limb temperature and the change in latencies of all potentials. ROM-testing procedures performed repeatedly increase ROM amplitude. This observation should be considered when evaluating the aftereffects of therapeutic interventions on ROM amplitude. None of the explored neurodynamic techniques produced acute aftereffects on hip ROM amplitude, spinal or muscle excitability different to the induced by the ROM testing maneuver.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15748es_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0)es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectH-reflexes_ES
dc.subjectMuscle stretching exerciseses_ES
dc.subjectNerve tissuees_ES
dc.subjectPhysical therapy modalitieses_ES
dc.subjectRange of motion articulares_ES
dc.titleAcute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H-reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: a controlled studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitlePsychological reportses_ES
UDC.volume11es_ES
UDC.issue2es_ES
UDC.startPagee15748es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem