Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorLópez-López, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorBecerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorSevillano Fernández, David
dc.contributor.authorAlou, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMartín Aragón, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorCollado Yurrita, Luis Rodolfo
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T11:24:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-09T11:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.identifier.citationVallejo, Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa PhD, DPM, DHLa; Fernandez, David Sevillano PhDa; Cervera, Luis Alou PhDb; Aragón, Laura Martín PhDa; Iglesias, Marta Elena Losa PhDc,∗; Yurrita, Luis Rodolfo Collado MD, PhDa; Lopez, Daniel Lopezd Effectiveness of surgical hand antisepsis using chlorhexidine digluconate and parachlorometaxylenol hand scrub, Medicine: October 2018 - Volume 97 - Issue 42 - p e12831 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012831es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/29928
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: Chlorhexidine and parachlorometaxylenol (PCMX) are antiseptics recommended for surgical hand antisepsis. To our knowledge, PCMX has not been evaluated for bactericidal efficacy “in vivo. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial to compare the bacterial loads on fingertips and fingernails under laboratory conditions after use of antiseptic test products, including chlorhexidine digluconate 4%, PCMX 3%, and a reference solution of propan-1-ol 60% (P-1). We assessed bacterial load after a prewash with soft soap, immediately after application of an antiseptic, and 3 hours after application and wearing of sterile, powder-free gloves. Our procedures followed those specified by European Norm (EN) 12791 for evaluating surgical hand antiseptics and using cotton swab for fingertips and fingernails. Results: Chlorhexidine digluconate 4% and PCMX 3% did not decrease bacterial load on the hands. The bactericidal performances of chlorhexidine digluconate 4% and PCMX 3% did not differ significantly. Chlorhexidine digluconate 4% and PCMX 3% increased bacterial load on the fingertips after participants had worn gloves for 3 hours. Fingernails had greater bacterial loads than skin on the fingertips. Conclusions: Chlorhexidine digluconate 4% and PCMX 3% had similar bactericidal efficacy, but they failed to meet the EN 12791 efficacy standard. Fingernails should be a particular focus of antisepsis in preparation for surgery. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02500758).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluweres_ES
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012831es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionales_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectAntisepsises_ES
dc.subjectAntisepsiaes_ES
dc.subjectRandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.subjectEnsayo controlado aleatorizadoes_ES
dc.subjectSurgical site infectiones_ES
dc.subjectInfección del área quirúrgicaes_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of Surgical Hand Antisepsis Using Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Parachlorometaxylenol Hand Scrubes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleMedicinees_ES
UDC.volume97es_ES
UDC.issue42es_ES
UDC.startPage12831es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem