Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLópez-López, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Flores, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorBecerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorPalomo-López, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Gómez, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Lobo, César
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T11:47:38Z
dc.date.available2022-03-08T11:47:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationNavarro-Flores, E., Becerro-De-bengoa-vallejo, R., Losa-Iglesias, M.E., Palomo-López, P., López-López, D., Sánchez-Gómez, R., Calvo-Lobo, C. Cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability of the spanish ROWAN foot pain assessment questionnaire (ROFPAQ-S) (2020) Pain Physician, 23 (1), pp. E1-E6.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1533-3159
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/29898
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: The ROWAN Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ) may be considered as a self-reported health questionnaire with 45 items to measure foot health problems such as foot pain. To date, the ROFPAQ has only been validated into an English-language version. Objectives: Therefore this study aim was to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability of the Spanish ROFPAQ version (ROFPAQ-S). Study Design: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Settings: Podiatry and physiotherapy clinical centers. Methods: The recommended forward/backward translation protocol was applied for the procedure of translation and cross-cultural adaptation from United Kingdom to Spain. Results: An adequate internal consistency (Cronbach α) was shown for the 3 domains about cognitive (α = 0.763-0.792), affective (α = 0.751-0.801), and sensory (α = 0.741-0.733) subscales, as well as for the total score (α = 0.822-0.813). Good test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [95% confidence interval]) was shown for the total score (ICC = 0.909 [0.850-0.944]), and each domain such as cognitive (ICC = 0.785 [0.648-0.869]), affective (ICC = 0.995 [0.991-0.997]), and sensory (ICC = 0.662 [0.447-0.794]) subscales. The Spearman correlations (rs) were adequate for the cognitive (rs = 0.81-0.83), affective (rs = 0.73-0.72), and sensory (rs = 0.67-0.63) subscales. Limitations: The original ROFPAQ was developed from a podiatry department of the health care national service. Conclusions: The ROFPAQ-S was shown as a valid and reliable tool with an acceptable use in the Spanish population.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Interventional Pain Physicianses_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzAxMA%3D%3D&journal=124es_ES
dc.rightsAcceso abertoes_ES
dc.subjectFootes_ES
dc.subjectPiees_ES
dc.subjectQuality of lifees_ES
dc.subjectCalidad de vidaes_ES
dc.subjectChronic paines_ES
dc.subjectDolor crónicoes_ES
dc.subjectValidation studieses_ES
dc.subjectEstudios de validaciónes_ES
dc.subjectHealth impact assessmentes_ES
dc.titleCross-Cultural Adaptation and Test-Retest Reliability of the Spanish ROWAN Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ-S)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitlePain Physicianes_ES
UDC.volume23es_ES
UDC.issue1es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record