Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorMontoto Marqués, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorTrillo-Dono, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorFerreiro-Velasco, María Elena
dc.contributor.authorSalvador de la Barrera, Sebastián
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Sotillo, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMourelo-Fariña, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorGaleiras, Rita
dc.contributor.authorMeijide-Faílde, Rosa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T12:57:29Z
dc.date.available2022-02-14T12:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-23
dc.identifier.citationMontoto-Marqués A, Trillo-Dono N, Ferreiro-Velasco ME, Salvador de la Barrera S, Rodríguez-Sotillo A, Mourelo-Fariña M. Risks factors of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(3):206-211es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1362-4393
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/29784
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Study design: Descriptive retrospective study. Objectives: To analyze risk factors associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) in cases of acute traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (tCSCI). Setting: Unidad de Lesionados Medulares, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, in Galicia (Spain). Methods: The study included patients with tCSCI who were hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2014. The following variables were analyzed: age, gender, etiology, neurological level, ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) grade, associated injuries, injury severity score (ISS), ASIA motor score (AMS) at admission and mortality. Results: A total of 146 patients met the study's inclusion criteria. The majority were men (74.7%) with mean age of 62.6 (s.d. ± 18.8) years. Sixty patients (41.1%) required MV. Mean age of ventilated vs. non-ventilated patients was 57.3 vs. 65.7. Men were more likely to require MV than women, ASIA grades A and B were also more likely to need MV than grades C and D, as well as patients with associated injuries. The AMS of patients receiving MV was lower than that of those who did not require MV (20.1 vs. 54.3). Moreover, the ISS was higher in patients receiving MV (31.2 vs. 13.4). An AMS ≤ 37 and an ISS ≥ 13 increased the risk of requiring MV by a factor of 11.98 and 7.28, respectively. Conclusions: Isolated factors associated with a greater risk of MV in tCSCI were: age, gender, ASIA grade, ISS and AMS. However, the only factor with a significant discriminatory ability to determine the need for MV was the AMS at admission.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0005-7es_ES
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at Springer Link.es_ES
dc.subjectCervical cordes_ES
dc.subjectInjury severity scorees_ES
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificiales_ES
dc.subjectRisk factorses_ES
dc.subjectSex factorses_ES
dc.subjectSpinal cord injurieses_ES
dc.titleRisks factors of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injured patientses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleSpinal Cordes_ES
UDC.volume56es_ES
UDC.issue3es_ES
UDC.startPage206es_ES
UDC.endPage211es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem