Benchmarking of Drought and Climate Indices for Agricultural Drought Monitoring in Argentina
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/28322
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Coleccións
- CITEEC-GEAMA - Artigos [114]
- OpenAIRE [368]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
Benchmarking of Drought and Climate Indices for Agricultural Drought Monitoring in ArgentinaData
2021Cita bibliográfica
Araneda-Cabrera, R. J., Bermudez, M., & Puertas, J. (2021). Benchmarking of drought and climate indices for agricultural drought monitoring in Argentina. Science of The Total Environment, v. 790, 148090.
Resumo
[Abstract] Site-specific studies are required to identify suitable drought indices (DIs) for assessing and predicting drought-related impacts. This study presents a benchmark of eight DIs and 19 large-scale climate indices (CIs) to monitor agricultural drought in Argentina. First, the link between the CIs and DIs was investigated at the departmental-administrative level and at different temporal scales. Then, the effectiveness of the DIs in explaining the variability of crop yields, understood as impacts of agricultural droughts, was evaluated using statistical regression models. Soybeans were used as the reference crop. Additionally, the performances of DIs and CIs in explaining the variability of crop yields were compared. The CIs located in the Pacific Ocean (El Niño 3.4 and El Niño 4) were found to have the best correlations with the DIs (R values up to 0.49). These relationships were stronger with longer temporal aggregations and during the wet and hot seasons (summer), showing a significant role in the triggering of droughts in Argentina. The DIs that best corelated with CIs were those that included temperature in their calculations (STCI, SVHI, and SPEI). The impacts of droughts on soybean production were better explained using DIs than with CIs (up to 89% vs 8% of variability explained) as predictors of the statistical models. SVHI-6 and SPEI-6, depending on the area of interest, were, during the phenological period of crop growth (summer), the most effective DIs in explaining annual variations in soybean yields. The results may be of interest in water resource management, drought risk management, and the Argentinean soybean production sector. Furthermore, they provide a foundation for future studies aimed at forecasting agricultural droughts and their impacts.
Palabras chave
Drought indices
Agricultural drought
Teleconnections
Statistical models
Soybean yield
Agricultural drought
Teleconnections
Statistical models
Soybean yield
Descrición
Financiado para publicación en acceso aberto: Universidade da Coruña/CISUG
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)