Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Hernández, Jorge M.
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorColomer Poveda, David
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Subiela, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorCugat, Ramón
dc.contributor.authorCerón, José J.
dc.contributor.authorMárquez, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Aranda, Luis Manuel
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Reyes, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorTvarijonaviciute, Asta
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T08:40:17Z
dc.date.available2024-08-22T08:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Hernández, J. M., Franco, L., Colomer-Poveda, D., Martínez-Subiela, S., Cugat, R., Cerón, J. J., Márquez, G., Martínez-Aranda, L.M., Jiménez-Reyes, P.& Tvarijonaviciute, A. (2019). Influence of sampling conditions, salivary flow, and total protein content in uric acid measurements in saliva. Antioxidants, 8(9), 389es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3921
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/38651
dc.description.abstract[Abstract]: Uric acid (UA) is the most abundant antioxidant compound in saliva and one of the most sensitive biomarkers for detecting changes in the oxidative status of the organism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of: (i) different methods of saliva sampling and (ii) the correction by salivary flow or total protein on UA concentrations in saliva. Paired saliva (collected by two different methods, passive drooling and using Salivette cotton rolls) and serum samples were obtained from 12 healthy men after the performance of two resistance training exercises of different level of effort that can produce different concentrations in UA in saliva. There were no significant differences between values of uric acid in saliva using Salivette and passive drool. Correlations between UA in serum and saliva and increases in UA in saliva after exercise were detected when saliva samples were obtained by passive drool and Salivette and were not corrected by salivary flow or total protein concentration. Therefore for UA measurements in saliva it would not be recommended to normalize the results by salivary flow or protein concentration. This study highlights the importance of choosing an adequate sampling method selection as well as the expression of results when analytes are measured in saliva.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación Séneca, Murcia; 19894/GERM/15es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/8/9/389es_ES
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectSentadillases_ES
dc.subjectBiomarcadoreses_ES
dc.subjectEstrés oxidativoes_ES
dc.subjectSalivares_ES
dc.subjectSquates_ES
dc.subjectBiomarkerses_ES
dc.subjectOxidative stresses_ES
dc.subjectSalivetteses_ES
dc.titleInfluence of Sampling Conditions, Salivary Flow, and Total Protein Content in Uric Acid Measurements in Salivaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleAntioxidantses_ES
UDC.volume8es_ES
UDC.issue9es_ES
UDC.startPage389es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8090389


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem