An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/37162Coleccións
- GI-PHG - Artigos [112]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working MemoryAutor(es)
Data
2020-09-01Cita bibliográfica
Luque-Casado, A., Rodríguez-Freiría, R., Fogelson, N., Iglesias-Soler, E., & Fernández-del-Olmo, M. (2020). An integrative clustering approach to tDCS individual response variability in cognitive performance: Beyond a null effect on working memory. Neuroscience, 443, 120-130. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.036
Resumo
[Abstract]: Despite the growing interest in the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the modulation of human cognitive function, there are contradictory findings regarding the cognitive benefits of this technique. Inter-individual response variability to tDCS may play a significant role. We explored the effects of anodal versus sham tDCSovertheleft prefrontal cortex (LPFC) on working memory performance, taking into account the inter-individual variability. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers received an ‘offline’ anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 15 min) to the left prefrontal cortex (F3 electrode site) in an intra-individual, cross-over, sham-controlled experimental design. n-back and Sternberg task performance was assessed before (baseline), immediately after tDCS administration (T1) and 5 min post-T1 (T2). We applied an integrative clustering approach to characterize both the group and individual responses to tDCS, as well as identifying naturally occurring subgroups that may be present within the total sample. Anodal tDCS failed to improve working memory performance in the total sample. Cluster analysis identified a subgroup of ‘responders’ who significantly improved their performance after anodal (vs. sham) stimulation, although not to a greater extent than the best baseline or sham condition. The proportion of ‘responders’ ranged from 15% to 59% across task conditions and behavioral outputs. Our findings show a high interindividual variability of the tDCS response, suggesting that the use of tCDS may not be an effective tool to improve working memory performance in healthy subjects. We propose that the use of clustering methods is more suitable in identifying ‘responders’ and for evaluating the efficacy of this technique. 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Palabras chave
Non-invasive brain stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Inter-individual variability
Cluster analysis
Cognition
Working memory
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Inter-individual variability
Cluster analysis
Cognition
Working memory
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Atribución 4.0 España
ISSN
0306-4522