Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the assessment of selected morphometric parameters of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in healthy individuals: An inter- and intra- rater reliability study

Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/37145
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España
Coleccións
- Investigación (FEP) [504]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the assessment of selected morphometric parameters of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in healthy individuals: An inter- and intra- rater reliability studyAutor(es)
Data
2021Cita bibliográfica
Romero, C., Abuín Porras, V., Navarro Flores, E., López, P. P., Mazoteras Pardo, V., Jiménez Cebrián, A. M. ... de la cruz torres, B. (2021). Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the assessment of selected morphometric parameters of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in healthy individuals: An inter- and intra- rater reliability study. Archives of Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/140294
Resumo
[Abstract] Introduction
Ultrasound imaging (USI) is useful to evaluate structures of the foot to guide treatment, but the
reliability of USI technique needs to be clarified. The goal of the study was to evaluate the intra- and
inter-examiner reliability of USI image capture, and measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA)
and thickness of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) for experienced and novice examiners
Material and methods
FHL images were captured for 20 healthy adults. Reliability of image capture was evaluated between
images repeated at 10-min interval for an experienced and a novice examiner. Reliability of imagebased measurements was evaluated for one experienced and one novice rater, using all images.
The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) were
calculated
Results
Intra-examiner reliability of image capture for the FHL muscle examined by USI was excellent for
both thickness (ICC3,1, 0.944–0.976; SEM, 6.8%–10.0%) and CSA (ICC3,1, 0.954–0.979; SEM,
10.8%–16.5%), with no effect of examiner experience. Reliability was also excellent for measurement
of thickness (ICC3,1, 0.954–0.972; SEM, 1.2%–9.6%) and CSA (ICC3,1, 0.961–0.986; SEM,
9.2%–14.1%), with no effects of experience.
Conclusions
Reliability of image capture and image-based measurements developed by USI of CSA and
thickness for the FHL muscle in healthy individuals was excellent, independent of the examiner
experience
Palabras chave
Ultrasound
Reliability
Flexor hallucis longus
Rater
Reliability
Flexor hallucis longus
Rater
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España