Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorCarballeira, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorIglesias-Soler, Eliseo
dc.contributor.authorFernández-del-Olmo, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorMayo, Xián
dc.contributor.authorFariñas Rodríguez, Juan
dc.contributor.authorRío-Rodríguez, Dan
dc.contributor.authorCarnero, Elvis
dc.contributor.authorStandley, Robert A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-26T12:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationIglesias-Soler, E., Fernández-Del-Olmo, M., Mayo, X., Fariñas, J., Río-Rodríguez, D., Carballeira, E., Carnero, E. A., Standley, R. A., Giráldez-García, M. A., Dopico-Calvo, X., & Tuimil, J. L. (2017). Changes in the Force-Velocity Mechanical Profile After Short Resistance Training Programs Differing in Set Configurations. Journal of applied biomechanics, 33(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0181es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1065-8483
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/36358
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] : The main aim of this study was to analyze the effect of resistance training programs differing in set configuration on mechanical force-velocity profiles. Thirteen participants performed 10 unilateral knee extension training sessions over 5 weeks. Each limb was randomized to one of the following set configurations: traditional (4 sets of 8 repetitions at maximum intended velocity, 10RM load, 3-min pause between sets) or interrepetition rest (32 maximum intended velocity repetitions, 10RM load, 17.4 s of rest between each repetition). Velocity of each repetition was recorded throughout the program. Before and after training, individual linear force velocities were calculated, and the following parameters were obtained: force and velocity axis intercept, slope, and estimated maximum power. Mean velocity was higher throughout the program for interrepetition rest configuration (0.54 ± 0.01 vs. 0.48 ± 0.01 m∙s–1 for interrepetition rest, and traditional configuration respectively; main effect of set configuration: P < .001). There was a significant increase in force and velocity intercepts, but a steeper negative slope after both training protocols (main effect of time: P < .001 for every variable). Differences in resistance training velocity did not affect the adaptations. Our results suggest that, in a short-term program, maximum intended rather than actual velocity is a key factor to modulate strength adaptations.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherHuman Kineticses_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0181es_ES
dc.rights© 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.es_ES
dc.subjectStrengthes_ES
dc.subjectKineticses_ES
dc.subjectPower outputes_ES
dc.subjectKnee extensiones_ES
dc.titleChanges in the Force-Velocity Mechanical Profile After Short Resistance Training Programs Differing in Set Configurationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.date.embargoEndDate9999/99/99es_ES
dc.date.embargoLift9999
UDC.journalTitleJournal of Applied Biomechanicses_ES
UDC.volume33es_ES
UDC.issue2es_ES
UDC.startPage144es_ES
UDC.endPage152es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0181


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem