Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Isasi, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorJorge-Soto, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorBaltar-Lorenzo, Clara
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Fernández, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorSobrido, María
dc.contributor.authorManteiga Urbón, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorBarcala-Furelos, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T07:34:29Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T07:34:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Isasi, S.; Jorge-Soto, C.; Castro-Fernández, C.; Baltar-Lorenzo, C.; Sobrido-Prieto, M.; Manteiga-Urbón, J.; Barcala-Furelos, R. Pediatric Ventilation Skills by Non-Healthcare Students: Effectiveness, Self-Perception, and Preference. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043026es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/32915
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Since a great number of infant cardiopulmonary arrests occur outside of the hospital, it is crucial to train laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques, especially those professionals that will work with infants and children. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efectiveness of ventilations performed by professional training students. The secondary objective was to analyze the preference between different ventilation and chest-compression methods. The sample consisted of 32 professional training students, 15 preschool students, and 17 physical education students. The activity was conducted separately for each group, and we provided a 10 min theoretical training about infant basic life support followed by a 45 min practical training using a Laerdal Little Anne QCPR CPR manikin. A practical test in pairs was organized to record the ventilation as performed by the participants, establishing the difference between the efficacious and the non-efficacious ones. Furthermore, we handed out a survey before and after training to evaluate their knowledge. More than 90% of the students completely agreed with the importance of learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques for their professional future. More than half of the sample considered that they perform the rescue breathings with the mouth-to-mouth method better. We observed that through mouth-to-mouth-nose ventilations, the number of effective ventilations was significantly higher than the effective ventilations provided by a self-inflating bag and mask (EffectiveMtoMN 6.42 ± 4.27 vs. EffectiveMask 4.75 ± 3.63 (p = 0.007)), which was the preferred method. In terms of the compression method, hands encircling the chest was preferred by more than 85% of students. Mouth-to-mouth nose ventilation is more efficient than bag-face-mask ventilation in CPR as performed by professional training and physical activity students. This fact must be considered to provide higher-quality training sessions to professional training students.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043026es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectSimulation traininges_ES
dc.subjectLearninges_ES
dc.subjectBystanderses_ES
dc.subjectEmergency carees_ES
dc.subjectVentilationses_ES
dc.subjectPediatric basic life supportes_ES
dc.subjectSimuladoreses_ES
dc.subjectAprendizajees_ES
dc.subjectUrgenciases_ES
dc.titlePediatric Ventilation Skills by Non-Healthcare Students: Effectiveness, Self-Perception, and Preferencees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes_ES
UDC.volume20es_ES
UDC.startPage3026es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem