Skip navigation
  •  Inicio
  • UDC 
    • Cómo depositar
    • Políticas do RUC
    • FAQ
    • Dereitos de Autor
    • Máis información en INFOguías UDC
  • Percorrer 
    • Comunidades
    • Buscar por:
    • Data de publicación
    • Autor
    • Título
    • Materia
  • Axuda
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Acceder
  •  Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
Ver ítem 
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Fisioterapia
  • Investigación (FFISIO)
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Fisioterapia
  • Investigación (FFISIO)
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Concordance between pressure platform and pedigraph

Thumbnail
Ver/abrir
GonzalezMartin_Concordance.pdf (5.017Mb)
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/30469
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Coleccións
  • Investigación (FFISIO) [503]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítem
Título
Concordance between pressure platform and pedigraph
Autor(es)
González-Martín, Cristina
Fernández-López, Uxía
Mosquera Fernández, Abián
Balboa-Barreiro, Vanesa
García-Rodríguez, María Teresa
Seijo Bestilleiro, Rocío
Veiga-Seijo, Raquel
Data
2021-12-09
Cita bibliográfica
Gonzalez-Martin C, Fernandez-Lopez U, Mosquera-Fernandez A, Balboa-Barreiro V, Garcia-Rodriguez MT, Seijo-Bestilleiro R, Veiga-Seijo R. Concordance between pressure platform and pedigraph. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;11(12):2322.
Resumo
[Abstract] Objectives: Determine the concordance between two methods of obtaining the plantar footprint (pedigraph and pressure platform). Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study of prevalence was carried out in the social center of Cariño (Coruña), Spain (n = 65 participants). Older people without amputations or the presence of dysmetria were included. The variables studied were: sociodemographic (age, sex), anthropometric (body mass index) and footprint measurement variables. These measurements were made by obtaining the plantar footprint using two methods: pedigraph and pressure platform. Results: The mean age of the sample was 37.42 ± 15.05 years, with a predominance of the female gender (61.54%). Positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices (correlation coefficient > 0.3, p < 0.001 in each comparison). The reliability was good or moderate in relation with the Chippaux and Staheli index. Slightly lower coefficients were observed in the dimensions of the foot. Conclusions: A positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices. Significant differences were observed between pedigraph and platform in relation to the width and length of the foot. It is probably due to the fact that the pressure platform provides more exhaustive, detailed and accurate information of the foot. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study of prevalence was carried out in the social center of Cariño (Coruña), Spain (n = 65 participants). Older people without amputations or the presence of dysmetria were included. The variables studied were: sociodemographic (age, sex), anthropometric (body mass index) and footprint measurement variables. These measurements were made by obtaining the plantar footprint using two methods: pedigraph and pressure platform. Results: The mean age of the sample was 37.42 ± 15.05 years, with a predominance of the female gender (61.54%). Positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices (correlation coefficient > 0.3, p < 0.001 in each comparison). The reliability was good or moderate in relation with the Chippaux and Staheli index. Slightly lower coefficients were observed in the dimensions of the foot. Conclusions: A positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices. Significant differences were observed between pedigraph and platform in relation to the width and length of the foot. It is probably due to the fact that the pressure platform provides more exhaustive, detailed and accurate information of the foot.
Palabras chave
Foot
Pedigragh
Pressure platform
 
Versión do editor
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122322
Dereitos
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2075-4418

Listar

Todo RUCComunidades e colecciónsPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulaciónEsta colecciónPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulación

A miña conta

AccederRexistro

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Suxestións