Comparison of Two Protocols for the Assessment of Maximal Respiratory Pressures: Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery Versus American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society
Ver/ abrir
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/29360
A non ser que se indique outra cousa, a licenza do ítem descríbese como Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0)
Coleccións
- GI-IPRF - Artigos [133]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítemTítulo
Comparison of Two Protocols for the Assessment of Maximal Respiratory Pressures: Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery Versus American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory SocietyAutor(es)
Data
2021-10-29Cita bibliográfica
Lista-Paz A, Sancho Marín S, Souto Camba S, et al. (October 29, 2021) Comparison of Two Protocols for the Assessment of Maximal Respiratory Pressures: Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery Versus American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. Cureus 13(10): e19129. doi:10.7759/cureus.19129
Resumo
[Abstract] Background. The measurement of maximal respiratory pressures (MRPs) is commonly used to assess respiratory muscle strength. However, in Spain, there is no consensus on which is the most adequate measurement protocol, as the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) protocol differs from the one endorsed by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS). This study compared the absolute and predictive values of maximal expiratory and inspiratory pressures (MEP and MIP) in healthy adults obtained with the two protocols.
Methods. A cross-sectional study with a sample of healthy adults was conducted. Lung function and MRPs were assessed. MEP and MIP were measured using a digital manometer according to the SEPAR and ATS/ERS. Protocols were applied in random order by the same trained physiotherapist. The comfort experienced with each protocol was assessed through a short questionnaire. Paired t-tests were used to compare the results from both protocols.
Results. A total of 31 subjects (mean age 35.7±12.4 years; 14 females; FEV₁=108.3±10.5%; FVC=103.7±10%) were included. There was a significant difference between MRPs favouring the SEPAR protocol, with the mean difference being 34.9±28.1 cmH₂O (p˂0.001) for MEP and 8±11.6 cmH₂O (p=0.001) for MIP. ATS/ERS protocol was, however, considered more comfortable than SEPAR (p<0.005).
Conclusions. This study shows that, in healthy adults, higher MRPs are obtained using the SEPAR protocol. Yet, the ATS/ERS protocol is experienced as more comfortable. Future studies are needed to analyse the application of both protocols in other populations and their associated comfort.
Palabras chave
Physical therapy modalities
Breathing exercises
Respiratory function tests
Respiratory muscles
Maximal respiratory pressures
Breathing exercises
Respiratory function tests
Respiratory muscles
Maximal respiratory pressures
Versión do editor
Dereitos
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
2168-8184
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor ou materia.
-
Análisis comparativo de la medición de las presiones respiratorias máximas según dos protocolos distintos
Sancho Marín, Sergio (2018)[Resumen] Objetivo. Realizar un análisis comparativo del valor de las presiones respiratorias máximas obtenidas siguiendo el protocolo internacional propuesto por la American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society ... -
Aplicabilidad de una prueba de resistencia inspiratoria y su capacidad para detectar cambios tras un programa de entrenamiento de la musculatura respiratoria en comparación con la máxima ventilación sostenible, en dos poblaciones de estudio
Losada García, Iria (2021-06)[Resumen] Introducción. La resistencia se define como la capacidad de mantener un esfuerzo submáximo durante un periodo de tiempo determinado. La valoración de la misma en lo referente a la musculatura respiratoria no se ... -
La función pulmonar en sujetos con hemiplejía/hemiparesia crónica: revisión bibliográfica
Lista-Paz, Ana; González Doniz, Luz (Elsevier, 2011-10-24)[Resumen] Objetivo: Realizar una revisión bibliográfica sobre la función pulmonar y la dinámica costal y diafragmática de los pacientes con hemiplejía/hemiparesia crónica. Material y métodos: Bases de datos: Medline, ...