Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorBenito-de-Pedro, María
dc.contributor.authorBecerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, David
dc.contributor.authorLópez-López, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCosín-Matamoros, Julia
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Jiménez, Eva María
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Lobo, César
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T17:54:34Z
dc.date.available2020-01-02T17:54:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.citationBenito-de-Pedro, M.; Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R.; Losa-Iglesias, M.E.; Rodríguez-Sanz, D.; López-López, D.; Cosín-Matamoros, J.; Martínez-Jiménez, E.M.; Calvo-Lobo, C. Effectiveness between Dry Needling and Ischemic Compression in the Triceps Surae Latent Myofascial Trigger Points of Triathletes on Pressure Pain Threshold and Thermography: A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1632.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/24563
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: Deep dry needling (DDN) and ischemic compression technic (ICT) may be considered as interventions used for the treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) in latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). The immediate effectiveness of both DDN and ICT on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and skin temperature of the latent MTrPs of the triceps surae has not yet been determined, especially in athletes due to their treatment requirements during training and competition. Objective: To compare the immediate efficacy between DDN and ICT in the latent MTrPs of triathletes considering PPT and thermography measurements. Method: A total sample of 34 triathletes was divided into two groups: DDN and ICT. The triathletes only received a treatment session of DDN (n = 17) or ICT (n = 17). PPT and skin temperature of the selected latent MTrPs were assessed before and after treatment. Results: Statistically significant differences between both groups were shown after treatment, showing a PPT reduction (p < 0.05) in the DDN group, while PPT values were maintained in the ICT group. There were not statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) for thermographic values before and treatment for both interventions. Conclusions: Findings of this study suggested that ICT could be more advisable than DDN regarding latent MTrPs local mechanosensitivity immediately after treatment due to the requirements of training and competition in athletes’ population. Nevertheless, further studies comparing both interventions in the long term should be carried out in this specific population due to the possible influence of delayed onset muscle soreness and muscle damage on PPT and thermography values secondary to the high level of training and competition.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101632es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAcupressurees_ES
dc.subjectMyofascial pain syndromees_ES
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal diseaseses_ES
dc.subjectTrigger pointses_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness between Dry Needling and Ischemic Compression in the Triceps Surae Latent Myofascial Trigger Points of Triathletes on Pressure Pain Threshold and Thermography : A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitleJournal of Clinical Medicinees_ES
UDC.volume8es_ES
UDC.issue10es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem