Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem

dc.contributor.authorRibera-Sánchez, Roi
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Fontán, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Iglesias, Antía
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Enríquez, Alba
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Carmona, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T10:46:04Z
dc.date.available2018-04-09T10:46:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRibera-Sánchez R, Pérez-Fontán M, López-Iglesias A, García-Enríquez A, Rodríguez-Carmona A. Comprehensive approach to peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis by enteric microorganisms: comparison between single organism and polymicrobial infections. Perit Dial Int. 2018; 38(2):139-146es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0896-8608
dc.identifier.issn1718-4304
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/20405
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: Peritoneal infections of enteric origin (EntP) have been classically investigated using partial strategies, focused on particular subgroups of microorganisms. A more comprehensive approach may facilitate the definition of the nomenclature and clinical presentation of these infections. Objectives: To investigate the clinical presentation and outcomes of a full spectrum of EntP, with a particular interest in the comparison between single-organism and polymicrobial infections. Method: Following an observational design, we investigated 165 single-organism and 83 polymicrobial peritonitis episodes with isolation of at least 1 enteric bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus spp. and/or intestinal anaerobics). We compared the risk of treatment failure for these 2 types of infection and explored the significance of the isolation of specific microorganisms and of their antibacterial susceptibility patterns. Results: Polymicrobial EntP was associated with higher rates of hospitalization, more changes to initial antibiotic therapy, more surgical explorations, and higher mortality and treatment failure rates than monobacterial EntP. However, stratified and multivariate analyses revealed that the burden of these differences rested on the isolation of intestinal anaerobics (odds ratio [OR] 12.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53–31.09, p < 0.001) and/or Enterococcus faecium (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.02–11.30, p = 0.046), while other polymicrobial infections were more comparable with single-organism peritonitis, except for even higher mortality rates in the former group. Lower antibiotic susceptibility of the isolations (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.51–2.70, p = 0.70) did not perform as a predictor of treatment failure. Conclusion: A comprehensive approach to peritoneal infections by intestinal microorganisms may provide a focused perspective of the clinical presentation and outcomes of these complications of peritoneal dialysis.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInternational Society for Pertioneal Dialysises_ES
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2017.00184es_ES
dc.subjectPeritoneal infectiones_ES
dc.subjectEnterobacteriaceaees_ES
dc.subjectAnaerobices_ES
dc.subjectEnterococcuses_ES
dc.subjectMortalityes_ES
dc.subjectTreatment failurees_ES
dc.titleComprehensive approach to peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis by enteric microorganisms: comparison between single organism and polymicrobial infectionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
UDC.journalTitlePeritoneal Dialysis Internationales_ES
UDC.volume38es_ES
UDC.issue2es_ES
UDC.startPage139es_ES
UDC.endPage146es_ES


Ficheiros no ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece na(s) seguinte(s) colección(s)

Mostrar o rexistro simple do ítem