Skip navigation
  •  Inicio
  • UDC 
    • Cómo depositar
    • Políticas do RUC
    • FAQ
    • Dereitos de Autor
    • Máis información en INFOguías UDC
  • Percorrer 
    • Comunidades
    • Buscar por:
    • Data de publicación
    • Autor
    • Título
    • Materia
  • Axuda
    • español
    • Gallegan
    • English
  • Acceder
  •  Galego 
    • Español
    • Galego
    • English
  
Ver ítem 
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Informática
  • Investigación (FIC)
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUC
  • Facultade de Informática
  • Investigación (FIC)
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy

Thumbnail
Ver/abrir
Pousada_Assessing.pdf (478.9Kb)
Use este enlace para citar
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/17572
Coleccións
  • Investigación (FIC) [1678]
Metadatos
Mostrar o rexistro completo do ítem
Título
Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy
Autor(es)
Pousada, Thais
Pereira-Loureiro, Javier
Groba, Betania
Nieto-Riveiro, Laura
Pazos, A.
Data
2014
Cita bibliográfica
Pousada T, Pereira J, Groba B, Nieto L, Pazos A. Assessing mouse alternatives to access to computer: a case study of a user with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2014;26(1):33-44
Resumo
[Abstract] The purpose of this study is to describe the process of assessment of three assistive devices to meet the needs of a woman with cerebral palsy (CP) in order to provide her with computer access and use. The user has quadriplegic CP, with anarthria, using a syllabic keyboard. Devices were evaluated through a three-step approach: (a) use of a questionnaire to preselect potential assistive technologies, (b) use of an eTAO tool to determine the effectiveness of each devised, and (c) a conducting semi-structured interview to obtain qualitative data. Touch screen, joystick, and trackball were the preselected devices. The best device that met the user's needs and priorities was joystick. The finding was corroborated by both the eTAO tool and the semi-structured interview. Computers are a basic form of social participation. It is important to consider the special needs and priorities of users and to try different devices when undertaking a device-selection process. Environmental and personal factors have to be considered, as well. This leads to a need to evaluate new tools in order to provide the appropriate support. The eTAO could be a suitable instrument for this purpose. Additional research is also needed to understand how to better match devices with different user populations and how to comprehensively evaluate emerging technologies relative to users with disabilities.
Palabras chave
Accesibility
Assistive technology
Computer access
Disability
Evaluation
 
Versión do editor
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.792880
Dereitos
This is an accepted manuscript of an articled published by Taylor & Francis in "Assistive Technology", avaliable at Taylor & Francis Online
ISSN
1040-0435
1949-3614
 

Listar

Todo RUCComunidades e colecciónsPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulaciónEsta colecciónPor data de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasGrupo de InvestigaciónTitulación

A miña conta

AccederRexistro

Estatísticas

Ver Estatísticas de uso
Sherpa
OpenArchives
OAIster
Scholar Google
UNIVERSIDADE DA CORUÑA. Servizo de Biblioteca.    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013 Duraspace - Suxestións