Observational study to compare biological drug concentration quantification techniques and immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated diseases

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.issue4es_ES
UDC.journalTitleBiomedicineses_ES
UDC.startPage839es_ES
UDC.volume12es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Pradeda, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorElberdín, Laida
dc.contributor.authorPorta Sánchez, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorOuteda, María
dc.contributor.authorDiz-Lois Palomares, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorVázquez-Rey, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Conde, Benito
dc.contributor.authorEstévez-Prieto, Emilio
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Besteiro, María I.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Herranz, Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T10:24:24Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T10:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-10
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Measuring biological drugs' trough concentrations and the concentrations of anti-drug antibodies is a valuable practice for treatment optimization. ELISA techniques are the gold standard for biological drug concentration quantification, but new techniques such as chemiluminescence immunoassays present some advantages. The aim of this unicentric prospective observational study is to compare the infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab trough levels and anti-adalimumab and anti-infliximab antibodies concentrations obtained when using a chemiluminescent instrument (i-TRACK®, Theradiag, Croissy-Beaubourg, France) and an ELISA instrument (TRITURUS®, Griffols, Barcelona, Spain). Linear regression, Pearson or Spearman tests, Bland-Altman plots and the Cohen kappa test were applied for every sample. The correlation was excellent for both assays in the measurement of all drug concentrations. In general, values were lower when measured using i-TRACK than when using TRITURUS, especially when the values were high. Both techniques proved valuable in clinical practice for monitoring adalimumab and infliximab drug concentration. However, the results were modest for ustekinumab and vedolizumab, so caution is recommended and further research is needed. The limited number of anti-drug antibody-positive samples precluded a comparison between the techniques.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Pradeda A, Elberdín L, Porta-Sánchez Á, Outeda M, Diz-Lois Palomares MT, Vázquez-Rey T, González-Conde B, Estévez-Prieto E, Gómez-Besteiro MI, Martín-Herranz I. Observational study to compare biological drug concentration quantification techniques and immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated diseases . Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):839.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomedicines12040839
dc.identifier.issn2227-9059
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/40305
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040839es_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectTherapeutic drug monitoringes_ES
dc.subjectTDMes_ES
dc.subjectELISAes_ES
dc.subjectCLIAes_ES
dc.subjectAnti-drug antibodieses_ES
dc.subjectBiological drugses_ES
dc.titleObservational study to compare biological drug concentration quantification techniques and immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated diseaseses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7722cca6-bf5f-49c8-aff1-5ed20748cd56
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7722cca6-bf5f-49c8-aff1-5ed20748cd56

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MPradeda_Observational_2024.pdf
Size:
840.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: