Observational study to compare biological drug concentration quantification techniques and immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated diseases

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Martínez-Pradeda, Alejandro
Elberdín, Laida
Porta Sánchez, Ángeles
Outeda, María
Diz-Lois Palomares, María Teresa
Vázquez-Rey, Teresa
González-Conde, Benito
Estévez-Prieto, Emilio
Martín-Herranz, Isabel

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Martínez-Pradeda A, Elberdín L, Porta-Sánchez Á, Outeda M, Diz-Lois Palomares MT, Vázquez-Rey T, González-Conde B, Estévez-Prieto E, Gómez-Besteiro MI, Martín-Herranz I. Observational study to compare biological drug concentration quantification techniques and immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated diseases . Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):839.

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Measuring biological drugs' trough concentrations and the concentrations of anti-drug antibodies is a valuable practice for treatment optimization. ELISA techniques are the gold standard for biological drug concentration quantification, but new techniques such as chemiluminescence immunoassays present some advantages. The aim of this unicentric prospective observational study is to compare the infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab trough levels and anti-adalimumab and anti-infliximab antibodies concentrations obtained when using a chemiluminescent instrument (i-TRACK®, Theradiag, Croissy-Beaubourg, France) and an ELISA instrument (TRITURUS®, Griffols, Barcelona, Spain). Linear regression, Pearson or Spearman tests, Bland-Altman plots and the Cohen kappa test were applied for every sample. The correlation was excellent for both assays in the measurement of all drug concentrations. In general, values were lower when measured using i-TRACK than when using TRITURUS, especially when the values were high. Both techniques proved valuable in clinical practice for monitoring adalimumab and infliximab drug concentration. However, the results were modest for ustekinumab and vedolizumab, so caution is recommended and further research is needed. The limited number of anti-drug antibody-positive samples precluded a comparison between the techniques.

Description

Rights

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)