Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/10350 Regulación del derecho a un proceso penal sin dilaciones indebidas: de la atenuante analógica a la atenuante específica del código penal
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 2011, 15: 555-576. ISSN: 1138-039X
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Resumen] El derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones indebidas es una garantía procesal que
está constitucionalizada, de manera autónoma pero íntimamente relacionada con el también
fundamental derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva sin indefensión. Aunque su respeto tiene
que hacerse efectivo en todo tipo de procesos, es en el penal en el que su vulneración es
especialmente grave, lo que ha provocado que la doctrina y la jurisprudencia hayan buscado
diversas opciones reparadoras de su lesión. La reforma del Código Penal de 2010 constituye
un avance importante en esta materia puesto que se abandona el anterior criterio de entender
las dilaciones indebidas como una “atenuante analógica”, legalizando su consideración como
una “atenuante específica”.
[Abstract] The right to trial without undue delay is a procedural guarantee that is constitutionalized, independently but also closely related to the fundamental right to effective judicial guidance without helplessness. Although this must be respected in all types of procedures, their violation is particularly serious in criminal ones and this has prompted the doctrine and jurisprudence to seek various remedial options for its breach. The Penal Code of 2010 constitutes an important advance in this matter since it leaves behind the former criterion to understand undue delay as a mitigating factor analogue, legalizing their consideration as a specific mitigating factor
[Abstract] The right to trial without undue delay is a procedural guarantee that is constitutionalized, independently but also closely related to the fundamental right to effective judicial guidance without helplessness. Although this must be respected in all types of procedures, their violation is particularly serious in criminal ones and this has prompted the doctrine and jurisprudence to seek various remedial options for its breach. The Penal Code of 2010 constitutes an important advance in this matter since it leaves behind the former criterion to understand undue delay as a mitigating factor analogue, legalizing their consideration as a specific mitigating factor



