Interrepetition rest set lacks the v-shape systolic pressure response advantage during resistance exercise

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Mayo, X.; Iglesias-Soler, E.; Kingsley, J.D.; Dopico, X. Interrepetition rest set lacks the v-shape systolic pressure response advantage during resistance exercise. Sports. 2017, 5, 90

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Resistance exercise may lead to an aneurysm due to dangerous levels of systemic hypertension. Thus, a minimized pressure response during exercise may guarantee safer training. For that, we analyzed an interrepetition rest design (IRD) hypothesizing that it would produce a lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) response in comparison with a continuous design (CD). Additionally, we studied the effect of accumulated repetitions on the increasing SBP rate during the first continuous set. Fifteen healthy participants (age: 24 ± 2 years; SBP: 113 ± 8 mmHg) performed leg presses, with 40 repetitions and 720 s of total rest, structured in an IRD of individual repetitions (resting time: 18.5 s), and in a CD of five sets of eight repetitions (resting time: 180 s). Analyses reported an increase (p = 0.013) in the mean peaks of SBP in the IRD (162 ± 21 mmHg), versus the CD (148 ± 19 mmHg), while both augmented versus baselines (p < 0.001). Additionally, the linear model estimated a progressive increase of SBP of around 7 mmHg per repetition. Summarily, the IRD produced a higher mean of the SBP peaks during the 40 repetitions due to lacking the v-shape advantage in comparison with the CD.

Description

Rights

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)