An Analysis of Schmidt and Stein’s Sport Commitment Model and Athlete Profiles

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

De Francisco, Cristina
Gómez-Guerra, Cynthia
Arce, Constantino

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

De Francisco, C.; Gómez-Guerra, C.; Vales-Vázquez, Á.; Arce, C. An Analysis of Schmidt and Stein’s Sport Commitment Model and Athlete Profiles. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031740

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] The sport commitment model proposed by Schmidt and Stein is one of the most complete paradigms on the etiology of burnout syndrome. According to this model, the degree of burnout of athletes is related to the nature of their commitment to sporting activity. Based on the Benefits, Costs, Satisfaction, Alternatives, and Investments, three types of athletes are defined: (1) athletes who are fully committed because they enjoy the activity; (2) athletes who are committed because they feel trapped; (3) athletes who are not committed and are at risk of abandonment. Analysis of cluster and analysis of variance were performed using data collected from a sample of 357 athletes. The results were aligned with the Schmidt and Stein model predictions in terms of athlete type and partial scores for each component of the model, although with slight variations. The percentage of athletes correctly classified is 99.35% for the cluster of committed athletes; 97.35% for the cluster of entrapped athletes; 96.63% for the cluster of non-committed athletes at risk of abandonment. In conclusion, the sport commitment model provides a useful approach to explain the etiology of burnout in athletes, helping to understand the psychological keys to the syndrome.

Description

Rights

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Atribución 4.0 Internacional

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional