Human-Centered Design Through Additive Manufacturing

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Suárez-García, Andrés
Devesa-Rey, Rosa
Álvarez Feijoo, Miguel Ángel

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Arce, E., Suárez-García, A., Devesa-Rey, R., Álvarez-Feijoo, M. (2024). Human-Centered Design Through Additive Manufacturing. In: Carou, D., Davim, J.P. (eds) Notes for Manufacturing Instructors. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48468-1_1

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Implementing Project-Based Learning in the classroom presents various challenges. It involves students collaborating in teams to tackle intricate problems, fostering the development of creative and critical thinking skills. One approach to address this challenge is through the utilization of Design Sprint (DS), an agile methodology typically completed within a five-day timeframe. DS aims to generate innovative designs that are rooted in user needs. Human-Centered Design (HCD) is an approach to problem-solving that focuses on understanding the needs, desires, and behaviors of the people who will use the product or service. HCD and DS are complementary approaches that can be used together to design effective, user-centered solutions. In the present work, they have been used to develop an Engineering Drawing classroom experience linked to Service-learning. Service-learning is an educational approach that combines community service with classroom instruction, focusing on critical, reflective thinking and civic responsibility. The experience integrated theory and practice, hard and soft skills, and empowered students to conduct research. The activities were designed both for face-to-face and remote learning activities. The effectiveness of the HCD-DS methodology in promoting an interactive learning environment and improving time management skills was demonstrated through the evaluation of prototypes using co-evaluation, hetero-evaluation, and self-evaluation rubrics. The approach offers several advantages, such as its adaptability to various fields and subjects and its simplicity.

Description

This version of the chapter has been accepted for publication and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48468-1_1

Keywords

Rights