Castro Mejuto, Luis Fernando de2014-04-302014-04-302012Anuario da Facultade de Ciencias do Traballo da Universidade da Coruña, 2012, 3: 257-264. ISSN: 2173-98112173-9811http://hdl.handle.net/2183/12072[Resumo] Este comentario trata dunha recente sentenza do Tribunal Supremo que casou outra procedente do Tribunal Superior de Xustiza de Galicia, en que se determina que os traballadores que prestan servizos a través das empresas públicas que xestionan as competencias autonómicas en materia de prevención e extinción de incendios –neste suposto, a Empresa Pública de Servizos Agrarios Galegos (SEAGA)– están unidos a elas non por contratos temporais de obra ou servizo, senón por outros por tempo indefinido de carácter descontinuo.[Abstract] This paper is about a recent judgment of the Supreme Court who has quashed another from the High Court of Justice of Galicia and determines that employees who provide services through state-owned companies managing autonomic competences in prevention and firefighting [in this case, the Public Company of Agricultural Service (SEAGA)], are linked to those not by temporary employment contracts for work or service, but by others for intermittent employment.glgContrato de obra ou servizo determinadosTraballador indefinido descontinuoPrevención e extinción de incendiosEmployment contract for work or serviceIntermittent employment workerPrevention and firefightingjournal articleopen access