Rodríguez-Romero, BeatrizSmith, Michelle D.Quintela-del-Río, AlejandroJohnston, Venerina2020-10-062020-10-062020-09-28Rodríguez-Romero B, Smith MD, Quintela-del-Rio A, Johnston V. What psychosocial and physical characteristics differentiate offce workers who develop standing-induced low back pain? a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17(19):7104.1661-7827http://hdl.handle.net/2183/26344[Abstract] This study examines demographic, physical and psychosocial factors associated with an increase in low back pain (LBP) during a one-hour standing task. A cross-sectional survey with 40 o ce workers was conducted. The primary outcome was pain severity during a one-hour standing task recorded every 15 min using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants were defined as pain developers (PD), if they reported a change in pain of 10 mm from baseline, or non-pain developers (NPD). Physical outcomes included participant-rated and examiner-rated trunk and hip motor control and endurance. Self-report history of LBP, physical activity, psychosocial job characteristics, general health and pain catastrophising were collected. Fourteen participants were PD. Hip abduction, abdominal and spinal muscle endurance was lower for PD (p 0.05). PD had greater self-reported di culty performing active hip abduction and active straight leg raise tests (p 0.04). Those reporting a lifetime, 12 month or 7-day history of LBP (p < 0.05) and lower self-reported physical function (p = 0.01) were more likely to develop LBP during the standing task. In conclusion, a history of LBP, reduced trunk and hip muscle endurance and deficits in lumbopelvic/hip motor control may be important to consider in o ce workers experiencing standing-induced LBP.engCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Low back pain (LBP)Standing positionMusculoskeletal painSedentary behaviourjournal articleopen access10.3390/ijerph17197104