Microembolic signal monitoring in hemispheric acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective study

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoFisioterapia, Medicina e Ciencias Biomédicases_ES
UDC.endPage282es_ES
UDC.grupoInvEnfermidades Cerebrovasculares: Neuroloxía Clínica e Traslacional (INIBIC)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroINIBIC - Instituto de Investigacións Biomédicas de A Coruñaes_ES
UDC.issue4es_ES
UDC.journalTitleCerebrovascular Diseaseses_ES
UDC.startPage278es_ES
UDC.volume10es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerena, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorSegura, Tomás
dc.contributor.authorCastellanos, María del Mar
dc.contributor.authorDávalos, Antoni
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T06:34:46Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T06:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2000-06-22
dc.descriptionClinical triales_ES
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background and purpose: There are few data on the occurrence of microembolic signals (MES) in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke. The objective of our work was to systematically study the frequency of MES in non-selected patients with a first-ever hemispheric transient ischemic attack (TIA) or acute cerebral infarction, and to evaluate the clinical usefulness of MES detection. Methods: 182 consecutive patients with hemispheric TIA or acute cerebral infarction, and 54-age-matched healthy controls were studied. Bilateral transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) monitoring was performed for at least 30 min with a mean time from stroke onset to TCD of 69 h. Stroke severity on admission, early recurrent stroke and dependency on discharge were investigated. Results: MES were detected in 20.5% of patients with arterial sources of embolism, 17. 1% of patients with potential sources of cardioembolism and 5% of patients with cryptogenic stroke. They were not registered, however, in lacunar infarctions (p < 0.001). Stroke severity on admission of patients with MES was greater than that of patients without MES (47. 1 vs. 19.4% with the Canadian Stroke Scale < or =6.5; p = 0.009). Early recurrent stroke was more frequent in patients with MES (11.8%) than in those without MES (4.2%) although the difference was not statistically significant. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that MES increased the risk of dependency on discharge (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.2-14.9; p = 0.01) independently of age, stroke severity on admission and presence of an arterial or cardiac embolic source. Conclusions: There is a strong association of MES in the acute phase of stroke with known potential arterial and cardiac embolic sources. MES have an independent predictive value of poor outcome.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationSerena J, Segura T, Castellanos M, Dávalos A. Microembolic signal monitoring in hemispheric acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Jul-Aug;10(4):278-82.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000016070
dc.identifier.issn1015-9770
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/40718
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherKargeres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000016070es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectIntracranial embolismes_ES
dc.subjectIschemic attack Transientes_ES
dc.subjectStrokees_ES
dc.titleMicroembolic signal monitoring in hemispheric acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfea87394-0be5-482f-b650-543f2240258c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfea87394-0be5-482f-b650-543f2240258c

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Serena_Microembolic_2000.pdf
Size:
225.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: