Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Widera, Pawel
Welsing, Paco M.J.
Danso, Samuel O.
Peelen, Sjaak
Kloppenburg, Margreet
Loef, Marieke
Marijnissen, Anne C.A.
van Helvoort, Eefje M.

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Widera P, Welsing PMJ, Danso SO, Peelen S, Kloppenburg M, Loef M, Marijnissen AC, van Helvoort EM, Blanco FJ, Magalhães J, Berenbaum F, Haugen IK, Bay-Jensen AC, Mobasheri A, Ladel C, Loughlin J, Lafeber FPJG, Lalande A, Larkin J, Weinans H, Bacardit J. Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Aug 18;5(4):100406.

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Objectives. To efficiently assess the disease-modifying potential of new osteoarthritis treatments, clinical trials need progression-enriched patient populations. To assess whether the application of machine learning results in patient selection enrichment, we developed a machine learning recruitment strategy targeting progressive patients and validated it in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis prospective study. Design. We designed a two-stage recruitment process supported by machine learning models trained to rank candidates by the likelihood of progression. First stage models used data from pre-existing cohorts to select patients for a screening visit. The second stage model used screening data to inform the final inclusion. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated using the actual 24-month progression. Results. From 3500 candidate patients, 433 with knee osteoarthritis were screened, 297 were enrolled, and 247 completed the 2-year follow-up visit. We observed progression related to pain (P, 30%), structure (S, 13%), and combined pain and structure (P ​+ ​S, 5%), and a proportion of non-progressors (N, 52%) ∼15% lower vs an unenriched population. Our model predicted these outcomes with AUC of 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81–0.90] for pain-related progression and AUC of 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52–0.70] for structure-related progression. Progressors were ranked higher than non-progressors for P ​+ ​S (median rank 65 vs 143, AUC = 0.75), P (median rank 77 vs 143, AUC = 0.71), and S patients (median rank 107 vs 143, AUC = 0.57). Conclusions. The machine learning-supported recruitment resulted in enriched selection of progressive patients. Further research is needed to improve structural progression prediction and assess this strategy in an interventional trial.

Description

Rights

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)