Comparing conditional survival functions with missing population marks in a competing risks model

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoMatemáticases_ES
UDC.endPage160es_ES
UDC.grupoInvModelización, Optimización e Inferencia Estatística (MODES)es_ES
UDC.journalTitleComputational Statistics & Data Analysises_ES
UDC.startPage150es_ES
UDC.volume95es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Dipankar
dc.contributor.authorJácome, M. A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T13:39:54Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T13:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-25
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] In studies involving nonparametric testing of the equality of two or more survival distributions, the survival curves can exhibit a wide variety of behaviors such as proportional hazards, early/late differences, and crossing hazards. As alternatives to the classical logrank test, the weighted Kaplan–Meier (WKM) type statistic and their variations were developed to handle these situations. However, their applicability is limited to cases where the population membership is available for all observations, including the right censored ones. Quite often, failure time data are confronted with missing population marks for the censored observations. To alleviate this, a new WKM-type test is introduced based on imputed population marks for the censored observations leading to fractional at-risk sets that estimate the underlying risk for the process. The asymptotic normality of the proposed test under the null hypothesis is established, and the finite sample properties in terms of empirical size and power are studied through a simulation study. Finally, the new test is applied on a study of subjects undergoing bone marrow transplantation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thanks the Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments led to a significantly improved version of the manuscript. They also thank Prof. Somnath Datta for suggesting the problem, and Todd DeFor from the University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center for providing the BMT dataset. Bandyopadhyay acknowledges support from the US National Institutes of Health grants R03DE023372 and R01DE024984. M. Amalia Jácome’s research was supported in part by grants MTM2011-22392 and CN 2012/130es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEstados Unidos. National Institutes of Health; R03DE023372es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEstados Unidos. National Institutes of Health; R01DE024984es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia; CN 2012/130es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBandyopadhyay, D., Jácome, M.A., 2016. Comparing conditional survival functions with missing population marks in a competing risks model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 95, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2015.10.001es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1872-7352
dc.identifier.issn0167-9473
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/33725
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2008-2011/MTM2011-22392/ES/INFERENCIA ESTADISTICA PARA DATOS COMPLEJOS Y DE ALTA DIMENSION: APLICACIONES EN ANALISIS TERMICO, FIABILIDAD NAVAL, GENOMICA, MALHERBOLOGIA, NEUROCIENCIA Y ONCOLOGIAes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2015.10.001es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCompeting riskes_ES
dc.subjectFractional risk setes_ES
dc.subjectLogrank testes_ES
dc.subjectRight censoringes_ES
dc.subjectWeighted Kaplan-Meieres_ES
dc.titleComparing conditional survival functions with missing population marks in a competing risks modeles_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione629ebcc-3475-4638-b4e7-bf3e786f997c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye629ebcc-3475-4638-b4e7-bf3e786f997c

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jacome_MA_2016_Comparing_conditional_survival_functions_missing_population_marks.pdf
Size:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: