Hydraulic modeling of bridges in two-dimensional shallow water models

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoEnxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.grupoInvEnxeñaría da Auga e do Medio Ambiente (GEAMA)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.journalTitleJournal of Hydraulic Engineeringes_ES
UDC.startPage06022006es_ES
UDC.volume148es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCea, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Alén, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorPuertas, Jerónimo
dc.contributor.authorPena, Luis
dc.contributor.authorVila Sánchez, Gabriela
dc.contributor.otherEnxeñaría da Auga e do Medio Ambiente (GEAMA)es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-14T20:26:39Z
dc.date.available2024-02-14T20:26:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionVersión aceptada de https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992es_ES
dc.description.abstract[Abstract:] The backwater effect generated by bridges can significantly increase the risk of flooding. In this work we compare two different methods to include the effect of bridges in two-dimensional (2D) shallow water models. The first method is based on empirical discharge equations that are implemented as internal conditions. The second method is the recently proposed 2D extension of the two-component pressure approach, which accounts for the vertical confinement of the flow. Both approaches are tested and compared using a new set of experimental data obtained in 32 laboratory tests, including four different bridge geometries under different flow conditions. The results show that both methods can reproduce the observed bridge afflux for a wide range of flow conditions, but the two-component pressure approach is less dependent on model calibration. On the other hand, both methods fail to correctly reproduce the 2D water depth patterns observed around the bridge.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study received financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Ministerio de Ciencia Innovacion y Universidades) within the project “VAMONOS: Development of non-hydrostatic models for environmental hydraulics. Two dimensional flow in rivers” (reference CTM2017-85171-C2-2-R).es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCea, L., Vila, G., García-Alén, G., Puertas, J., & Pena, L. (2022). Hydraulic modeling of bridges in two-dimensional shallow water models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 148(8), 06022006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/35605
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineerses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CTM2017-85171-C2-2-R/ES/DESARROLLO DE MODELOS NO-HIDROSTATICOS EN ESTUDIOS HIDROAMBIENTALES. FLUJO 2D EN RIOSes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001992es_ES
dc.rights© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subject2D shallow water modeles_ES
dc.subjectBackwater effectes_ES
dc.subjectEmpirical discharge equationses_ES
dc.subjectTwo-component pressure approaches_ES
dc.subject2D water depth patternses_ES
dc.titleHydraulic modeling of bridges in two-dimensional shallow water modelses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd914d106-6715-40cf-b743-1e240f37dc94
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa9e9c42e-7b4e-4b59-93d6-57b45e8f4270
relation.isAuthorOfPublication77acd780-2dc6-4b86-a32f-60c2c75b86c4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9c35a812-8f09-4663-b329-b6eb2bb71c75
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd914d106-6715-40cf-b743-1e240f37dc94

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CeaLuis_2022_JoHE_148_06022006.pdf
Size:
3.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión aceptada