Efficacy of the once-daily tacrolimus formulation LCPT compared to the immediate-release formulation in preventing early post-transplant diabetes in high-risk kidney transplant patients: a randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study (EUDRACT: 2017-000718-52)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Torres, Armando
Rodríguez-Adanero, Concepción
Fernández Rivera, Constantino
Marrero-Miranda, Domingo
de Bonis-Redondo, Eduardo
Rodríguez-Hernández, Aurelio P.
Pérez-Tamajón, Lourdes
González-Rinne, Ana
Álvarez-Sosa, Diego
Álvarez-González, Alejandra

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Torres A, Rodríguez-Adanero C, Fernández-Rivera C, Marrero-Miranda D, de Bonis-Redondo E, Rodríguez-Hernández AP, Pérez-Tamajón L, González-Rinne A, Álvarez-Sosa D, Álvarez-González A, Sanchez-Dorta N, Pérez-Carreño E, Díaz-Martín L, Luis-Lima S, Rodríguez-Rodríguez AE, Vera González AM, Romero-Delgado C, Calvo-Rodríguez M, Seijo-Bestilleiro R, Rodríguez-Jiménez C, Prieto López MA, Rivero-González AM, Hernández-Marrero D, Porrini E. Efficacy of the once-daily tacrolimus formulation LCPT compared to the immediate-release formulation in preventing early post-transplant diabetes in high-risk kidney transplant patients: a randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study (EUDRACT: 2017-000718-52). J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 20;13(24):7802.

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Background/Objectives: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes (PreDM) are common after renal transplantation and increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), the LCPT formulation, with delayed absorption, offers higher bioavailability and a smoother time-concentration curve, potentially reducing beta-cell stress. Methods: This randomized pilot trial compared de novo immunosuppression with IR-Tac (twice daily) and LCPT (once daily). At-risk recipients (age ≥ 60 years or 18-59 years with metabolic syndrome) were enrolled and followed for 3 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of PTDM and PreDM, respectively. Results: 27 patients were randomized to IR-Tac and 25 to LCPT. The incidence of PTDM was comparable between groups [IR Tac: 18.5% (95% CI: 8.2-36.7%) vs. LCPT: 24% (95% CI: 11.5-43.4%); p = 0.7]. Although not statistically significant, the LCPT group exhibited a trend toward a reduction in PreDM incidence [IR-Tac: 40.7% (95% CI: 25-59%) vs. LCPT: 20% (95% CI: 9-39%); p = 0.1]. A sensitivity analysis showed similar results, with no significant differences in cumulative corticosteroid doses or baseline body mass index (BMI) between groups. The LCPT group showed a trend toward higher tacrolimus exposure at the end of the study [trough levels: IR-Tac group 8.3 (6.9-9.2) vs. LCPT group 9.4 (7.4-11.4) ng/mL; p = 0.05)], as well as fewer acute rejection episodes (none vs. three). Delayed graft function was more common in the IR-Tac group (37% vs. 8%; p = 0.01), and the eGFR was lower. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: The potential biological activity of LCPT in preventing glucose metabolic alterations in at-risk patients warrants further investigation.

Description

Rights

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License