Ecophysiological Differentiation Between Two Invasive Species of Carpobrotus Competing Under Different Nutrient Conditions

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoBioloxíaes_ES
UDC.endPage1465es_ES
UDC.grupoInvBioloxía Costeira (BIOCOST)es_ES
UDC.issue11 (November)es_ES
UDC.journalTitleAmerican Journal of Botany (AJB)es_ES
UDC.startPage1454es_ES
UDC.volume106 (2019)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCampoy, Josefina G.
dc.contributor.authorRoiloa, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorSantiso, Xabier
dc.contributor.authorRetuerto, Rubén
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T16:31:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T16:31:53Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-13
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1382.es_ES
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Premise: Hybridization between the South African invasive species Carpobrotus edulis and C. acinaciformis in Europe has led to the formation of highly aggressive morphotypes referred to in the scientific literature as the new large “hybrid swarm” C. aff. acinaciformis. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether the taxonomic differentiation between taxa coincides with ecophysiological differentiation. With this aim, we tested for differences between both morphotypes in functional traits related to competitive ability and resource-use efficiency. Assuming that the complex hybrid C. aff. acinaciformis is more vigorous, depends more strongly on vegetative reproduction, and invests less in sexual reproduction than C. edulis, we predicted that the hybrid would show higher competitive ability and better physiological performance compared with the species. Methods: We used a comparative ecophysiological approach to assess the extent to which two Carpobrotus morphotypes coexisting in northwestern Spain differ in physiological, reproductive, and growth traits when competing under different soil nutrients in controlled greenhouse conditions. Results: C. aff. acinaciformis had a greater relative growth rate and water-use and photochemical efficiencies compared to C. edulis. However, C. edulis appeared to be more responsive to incremental change in soil nutrients than C. aff. acinaciformis. They also differed in the amount of resources invested in reproduction. Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate that the taxonomic differentiation between taxa corresponds to ecophysiological differentiation, warranting a detailed examination of all existing trades-offs to predict the long-term outcomes of the interaction between these taxa.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for financial support for this study (grant no. CGL2013-48885-C2-2-R to R.R.). The authors are deeply grateful to the company Biostatech Advice Training and Innovation In Biostatistics S.L., especially to Jose Luis Otero-Ferrer, for assistance with data analyses. They also thank Associate Editor Dylan Schwilk and three anonymous reviewers for useful suggestions and comments that greatly improved the manuscript.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCampoy, J. G., S. R. Roiloa, X. Santiso, and R. Retuerto. 2019. Ecophysiological differentiation between two invasive species of Carpobrotus competing under different nutrient conditions. American Journal of Botany 106(11): 1454–1465.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajb2.1382
dc.identifier.issn1537-2197
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/40847
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CGL2013-48885-C2-2-R/ES/RETOS EN LA GESTION DE LA PLANTA INVASORA CARPOBROTUS EDULIS: CAMBIOS FENOTIPICOS EN EL CURSO DE LA INVASION, RESPUESTAS A ESCENARIOS DE CAMBIO GLOBAL Y CONTROL BIOLOGICO/es_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1382es_ES
dc.rightsThis article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions (https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html). This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectAizoaceaees_ES
dc.subjectBiomass allocationes_ES
dc.subjectChlorophyll fluorescencees_ES
dc.subjectIce plantes_ES
dc.subjectInterspecific competitiones_ES
dc.subjectIsotopic discriminationes_ES
dc.subjectLeaf reflectancees_ES
dc.subjectPhotochemical efficiencyes_ES
dc.subjectPlant water contentes_ES
dc.subjectSoil nutrientses_ES
dc.titleEcophysiological Differentiation Between Two Invasive Species of Carpobrotus Competing Under Different Nutrient Conditionses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf4ecff54-557c-4a0d-a6d5-c05e705c9b5a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf4ecff54-557c-4a0d-a6d5-c05e705c9b5a

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Roiloa_Sergio_2019_Ecophysiological_differentiation_two_invasive_species_Carpobrotus_unlocked.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: