Discordance of the evaluation of the plantar footprint in kidney transplant

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoFisioterapia, Medicina e Ciencias Biomédicases_ES
UDC.grupoInvGrupo de Investigación en Reumatoloxía e Saúde (GIR-S)es_ES
UDC.issue2es_ES
UDC.journalTitleJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Associationes_ES
UDC.volume111es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Martín, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorBalboa-Barreiro, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorVeiga-Seijo, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorSeoane-Pillado, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorLema-Verdía, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCouceiro Sánchez, Estefanía
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T10:28:05Z
dc.date.embargoEndDate9999-99-99es_ES
dc.date.embargoLift10007-06-07
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Background: The measures used for the diagnosis of biomechanical pathologic disorders are variable. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance between the Clarke angle and the Chippaux-Smirak and Staheli indices in evaluation of the footprints of kidney transplant patients. Methods: An observational prevalence study was performed in kidney transplant patients in the University Hospital Complex A Coruña from 1981 through 2014. After obtaining patient informed consent and ethics committee approval, sociodemographic (age and sex) and anthropometric (body mass index) variables and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score) were assessed for each patient, and a podiatric medical examination was performed of the footprint through a pedigree (Chippaux-Smirak index, Staheli index, and Clarke angle). A descriptive analysis of all of the variables was performed; for agreement, the kappa index and the Bland-Altman method were used. Results: We found a predominance of male sex (65.6%) and a high level of overweight (43.3%) in the sample. The highest concordance between the indices studied is presented by the Chippaux-Smirak index, with a kappa index of 0.86 for the left foot and 0.76 for the right foot. Conclusions: High agreement was attained among observers in measurements of the footprints of kidney transplant patients.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Martín C, Balboa-Barreiro V, Veiga-Seijo R, Seoane-Pillado T, Lema-Verdía L, Couceiro-Sanchez E. Discordance of the Evaluation of the Plantar Footprint in Kidney Transplant. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;111(2):Article_6.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.7547/18-160
dc.identifier.issn8750-7315
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/39148
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Podiatry Medical Associationes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.7547/18-160es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoed accesses_ES
dc.subjectKidney transplantationes_ES
dc.subjectPodiatryes_ES
dc.titleDiscordance of the evaluation of the plantar footprint in kidney transplantes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication27c5a3e1-b1e1-4bc4-bc26-eae066d2fdbc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2c631412-f1c4-49ea-a1db-ad443415caf5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication65347b86-1145-46c6-b113-3dec5738e6ab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery27c5a3e1-b1e1-4bc4-bc26-eae066d2fdbc

Files