Pacemaker indications and long-term stability of pacing indices in heart transplant recipients

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Fernández de-Aspe, Pablo
Vázquez García, Raquel
Used, Alejandro
Rodríguez Garrido, Jorge Luis
Mosquera Pérez, Ignacio
Paniagua-Martín, María J.
Barge-Caballero, Eduardo
Barge-Caballero, Gonzalo
Couto-Mallón, David
Enríquez-Vázquez, Daniel

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

de-Aspe PF, Vázquez-García R, Used-Gavín A, Rodríguez-Garrido JL, Mosquera-Pérez I, Paniagua-Martín MJ, Barge-Caballero E, Barge-Caballero G, Couto-Mallón D, Enríquez-Vázquez D, García-Vieites M, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, Crespo-Leiro MG, Ricoy-Martínez E. Pacemaker indications and long-term stability of pacing indices in heart transplant recipients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1336-1343.

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Background: Approximately 10% of heart transplant (HT) recipients require a pacemaker (PM) implant. Despite graft-related complications such as rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy and fibrosis, there is no evidence on the long-term stability of pacing indices. Moreover, one of the most common indications for PM implant is early post-transplant sinus node dysfunction (SND), although this is reversible in many cases. Methods and results: A retrospective observational study including all HT recipients at our institution who underwent permanent PM implantation between April 1991 and January 2023 was conducted. The incidence of PM implantation, indications for PM implantation and changes in pacing indices were evaluated. A total of 861 adult HT were performed (92.1% using bicaval anastomosis technique), and 46 received a permanent pacemaker (cumulative incidence 5.3%) over a median follow-up of 7.9 years (IQR 2.5-15.1 years). Only one patient (2%) received a PM due to early post-HT SND. The median PM follow-up time was 5.4 years (IQR 2.0-8.1 years). Atrial and ventricular leads showed an initial impedance drop (p < 0.001 both) and an initial capture threshold increase (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) with subsequent stabilization. R-wave amplitude remained stable, but there was a drop in P-wave amplitude (p = 0.026). Conclusions: Pacing indices remained stable and showed a behavior similar to that of native hearts except for a progressive decrease in P-wave amplitude, suggesting the need to aim for the highest possible P-wave amplitude during implantation.

Description

Observational study

Rights

This is the peer reviewed version of the article which has been published in final form at Wiley Online. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.