Crushing analysis and multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of GFRP honeycomb-filled energy absorption devices

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoConstrucións e Estruturas Arquitectónicas, Civís e Aeronáuticases_ES
UDC.endPage39es_ES
UDC.grupoInvMecánica de Estruturas (ME)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroCITEEC - Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civiles_ES
UDC.journalTitleFinite Elements in Analysis and Designes_ES
UDC.startPage30es_ES
UDC.volume91es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPaz Méndez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, J.
dc.contributor.authorRomera, Luis
dc.contributor.authorCostas, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T16:21:40Z
dc.date.available2019-01-31T16:21:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstract[Abstract:] Fuel efficiency and occupant safety are two of the most important concerns in the automotive industry nowadays. Encouraged by the importance of this field of study, this research attempts an improvement in the crashworthiness of a vehicle crash absorber. This component consists in a square hollow steel tube filled with a honeycomb structure made of glass-fiber reinforced polyamide. Surrogate-based optimization techniques are used. The three objective functions chosen — mass, absorbed energy and peak load — are approximated by two different models: multivariate adaptive regression splines and Gaussian process (kriging). The thickness of both parts, the shape of the honeycomb and its height are selected as design variables. Two preliminary analyses of the specimen are performed: the computation of the interaction effect and a comparison of a hollow tube with the specimen. From the results of multi-objective crashworthiness optimization two Pareto frontiers are obtained, one for the absorbed energy and mass, and another one for the absorbed energy and peak load. The results achieved show great improvements on all objective functions compared to the original design. The peak load is reduced by 37% on a specimen with similar mass and absorbed energy, and the specific energy absorbed is increased by 39.5% for a specimen with a similar peak load to the one from the initial model.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia. INCITE09; 09DPI01118PRes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia. INCITE09; GRC2013-056es_ES
dc.identifier.citationPaz, J., Díaz, J., Romera, L., & Costas, M. (2014). Crushing analysis and multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of GFRP honeycomb-filled energy absorption devices. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 91, 30–39.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.finel.2014.07.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/21645
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2014.07.006es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectCrashworthinesses_ES
dc.subjectMulti-objective optimizationes_ES
dc.subjectSurrogate methodses_ES
dc.subjectHoneycomb structurees_ES
dc.subjectGenetic algorithmses_ES
dc.titleCrushing analysis and multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of GFRP honeycomb-filled energy absorption deviceses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd8b9308d-cb23-4e26-a6c3-091c6d957fca
relation.isAuthorOfPublication57baab9f-d6c3-4a94-a5d6-c20ed1ca0014
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd8b9308d-cb23-4e26-a6c3-091c6d957fca

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PazMendez_Javier_2014_Crushing_analysis.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: