Governing the circular–digital transition: Comparative legal-institutional analysis of smart waste strategies in Spain and Portugal

Bibliographic citation

Sobrino-García I. Governing the circular–digital transition: Comparative legal-institutional analysis of smart waste strategies in Spain and Portugal. RECIEL. 2026; 1-13. doi:10.1111/reel.70057

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] This article analyses how regulatory and governance frameworks influence the implementation of smart waste strategies in the context of the EU's circular and digital transitions. Focusing on Spain and Portugal—two EU Member States subject to shared supranational obligations but marked by divergent legal traditions and administrative structures—this paper explores how national laws, planning instruments and smart city strategies mediate the local uptake of EU environmental and digital mandates. Drawing on regulatory governance and multilevel governance theory, the article argues that smart city strategies function as soft regulatory tools whose effectiveness depends on their integration within legally binding frameworks and their articulation with institutional capacities at different levels. The findings reveal that while both countries have transposed relevant EU directives, implementation remains fragmented due to decentralised competences, variable municipal capacities and limited data governance. The article concludes that regulatory convergence alone is insufficient and calls for stronger integration mechanisms to ensure a coherent, inclusive and effective circular–digital transition.

Description

Funding for open access charge: Universidade da Coruña/CISUG.

Rights

© 2026 The Author(s). Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (RECIEL) published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Copyright © 1999-2026 John Wiley & Sons, Inc or related companies. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
© 2026 The Author(s). Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (RECIEL) published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Copyright © 1999-2026 John Wiley & Sons, Inc or related companies. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies.

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2026 The Author(s). Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (RECIEL) published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Copyright © 1999-2026 John Wiley & Sons, Inc or related companies. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies.