Relevance of collaterals for the success of neuroprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: Insights from the randomized URICO-ICTUS Trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Identifiers

Publication date

Authors

Amaro, Sergio
Renú, Arturo
Laredo, Carlos
Arenillas, Juan
Llul, Laura
Rudilloso, Salvatore
Urra, Xabier
Obach, Victor
Chamorro, Ángel

Advisors

Other responsabilities

Journal Title

Bibliographic citation

Amaro S, Renú A, Laredo C, Castellanos M, Arenillas JF, Llull L, Rudilloso S, Urra X, Obach V, Chamorro Á; on behalf of the URICO-ICTUS investigators. Relevance of Collaterals for the Success of Neuroprotective Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights from the Randomized URICO-ICTUS Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;47(3-4):171-177.

Type of academic work

Academic degree

Abstract

[Abstract] Background: Collateral circulation may modify the effect of neuroprotective therapies. We report a post hoc analysis of the URICO-ICTUS trial (NCT00860366) assessing the modifying treatment effect of pretreatment collaterals on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with large-vessel acute ischemic stroke receiving uric acid therapy or placebo. Methods: URICO-ICTUS was a randomized clinical trial where 411 alteplase-treated patients also received uric acid 1,000 mg (n = 211) or placebo (n = 200) before the end of alteplase infusion. Herein, we included a nested study of 84 patients (placebo = 40, uric acid = 44) who had a pretreatment CT-angiography (CTA) showing a proximal arterial occlusion in the carotid territory. Excellent collaterals were defined as 100% collateral supply on pretreatment CTA. Regression models assessed the interaction between therapy (uric acid/placebo) and collaterals on the main outcome (ordinal modified Rankin Scale [mRS] shift at 90 days). Results: Overall, excellent collaterals were associated with improved outcome. There was a significant interaction between therapy and pretreatment collaterals (p interaction = 0.02) for the prediction of improved mRS shift. The largest treatment contrast in favor of uric acid was found in patients with excellent collaterals (adjusted OR 9.2; 95% CI 1.23-68.6; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Collectively, the study found that collaterals were associated with the neuroprotective effect of uric acid therapy highlighting the importance of assessing collateral status in neuroprotection trials.

Description

Clinical trial

Rights

This is the accepted manuscript version of an article published by Karger Publishers in Cerebrovascular Diseases and available on karger.com