Cytogenetic characterisation of the razor shells "Ensis directus" (Conrad, 1843) and "E. minor" (Chenu, 1843) (Mollusca: Bivalvia)

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoBioloxíaes_ES
UDC.endPage82es_ES
UDC.grupoInvGrupo de Investigación en Bioloxía Evolutiva (GIBE)es_ES
UDC.issue1es_ES
UDC.journalTitleHelgoland Marine Researches_ES
UDC.startPage73es_ES
UDC.volume67es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Tizón, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorRojo Oróns, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorVierna Fernández, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorJensen, K. Thomas
dc.contributor.authorEgea, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Lage, Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-07T10:56:29Z
dc.date.available2017-07-07T10:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-26
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] The European razor shell Ensis minor (Chenu 1843) and the American E. directus (Conrad 1843) have a diploid chromosome number of 38 and remarkable differences in their karyotypes: E. minor has four metacentric, one metacentric–submetacentric, five submetacentric, one subtelocentric and eight telocentric chromosome pairs, whereas E. directus has three metacentric, two metacentric–submetacentric, six submetacentric, six subtelocentric and two telocentric pairs. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) using a major ribosomal DNA probe located the major ribosomal genes on one submetacentric chromosome pair in both species; FISH with a 5S ribosomal DNA (5S rDNA) probe rendered one chromosomal (weak) signal for E. minor and no signal for E. directus, supporting a more dispersed organisation of 5S rDNA compared to the major ribosomal genes. The vertebrate telomeric sequence (TTAGGG)n was located on both ends of each chromosome, and no interstitial signals were detected. In this work, a comparative karyological analysis was also performed between the four Ensis species analysed revealing that the three European species studied so far, namely E. minor, E. siliqua (Linné 1758) and E. magnus Schumacher 1817 show more similarities among them than compared to the American species E. directus. In addition, clear karyotype differences were found between the morphologically similar species E. minor and E. siliqua.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Educación y Ciencia; CTM2007-28919-E/MARes_ES
dc.identifier.citationGonzález-Tizón A, Rojo V, Vierna J, Jensen KT, Egea E, Martínez-Lage A (2013) Cytogenetic characterisation of the razor shells Ensis directus (Conrad, 1843) and E. minor (Chenu, 1843) (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Helgol Mar Res 67:73-82.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1438-387X
dc.identifier.issn1438-3888
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/19229
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-012-0305-4es_ES
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-012-0305-4.es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectRazor shellses_ES
dc.subjectKaryotypees_ES
dc.subjectFISHes_ES
dc.subject18S-5.8S-28S rDNAes_ES
dc.subject5S rDNAes_ES
dc.subjectTelomeric sequencees_ES
dc.titleCytogenetic characterisation of the razor shells "Ensis directus" (Conrad, 1843) and "E. minor" (Chenu, 1843) (Mollusca: Bivalvia)es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication14fadd80-def4-40c2-9d45-586b905a1652
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7f97109f-ce0d-49bb-9c37-b37f4c1887a1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery14fadd80-def4-40c2-9d45-586b905a1652

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MartinezLage_Andres_2013_Cytogenetic_characterisation_razor_shells_Ensis_directus_and_Ensis_minor.pdf
Size:
398.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: