Comparative study of the glistening between four intraocular lens models assessed by OCT and deep learning

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoCiencias da Computación e Tecnoloxías da Informaciónes_ES
UDC.endPage42es_ES
UDC.grupoInvGrupo de Visión Artificial e Recoñecemento de Patróns (VARPA)es_ES
UDC.issue1es_ES
UDC.journalTitleJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgeryes_ES
UDC.startPage37es_ES
UDC.volume50es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Vigo, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorMacarro-Merino, Ana
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Joaquim de
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Rodríguez, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorBurgos-Blasco, Bárbara
dc.contributor.authorNovo Buján, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Hortas, Marcos
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Vigo, José A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T11:21:51Z
dc.date.embargoEndDate2025-01-01es_ES
dc.date.embargoLift2025-01-01
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the glistening in 4 different models of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and deep learning (DL). Setting: Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada (Madrid, Spain). Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: 325 eyes were assessed for the presence and severity of glistening in 4 IOL models: ReSTOR+3 SN6AD1 (n = 41), SN60WF (n = 110), PanOptix TFNT (n = 128) and Vivity DFT015 (n = 46). The presence of glistening was analyzed using OCT, identifying the presence of hyperreflective foci (HRF) in the central area of the IOL. A manual and an original DL-based quantification algorithm designed for this purpose was applied. Results: Glistening was detected in 22 (53.7%) ReSTOR SN6AD1, 44 (40%) SN60WF, 49 (38.3%) PanOptix TFNT, and 4 (8.7%) Vivity DFT015 IOLs, when any grade was considered. In the comparison of the different types of IOLs, global glistening measured as total HRF was 17.3 ± 25.9 for the ReSTOR+3; 9.3 ± 15.7 for the SN60WF; 6.9 ± 10.5 for the PanOptix; and 1.2 ± 2.6 for the Vivity (P < .05). There was excellent agreement between manual and DL-based quantification (≥0.829). Conclusions: It is possible to quantify, classify and compare the glistening severity in different IOL models using OCT images in a simple and objective manner with a DL algorithm. In the comparative study, the Vivity presented the lowest severity of glistening.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationFernández-Vigo, José Ignacio; Macarro-Merino, Ana; De Moura-Ramos, Jose Joaquim; Alvarez-Rodriguez, Lorena; Burgos-Blasco, Barbara; Novo-Bujan, Jorge; Ortega-Hortas, Marcos; Fernández-Vigo, José Ángel. Comparative study of the glistening between four intraocular lens models assessed by OCT and deep learning. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 50(1):p 37-42, January 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001316es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/36499
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRSes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001316es_ES
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024, Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRSes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectGlisteninges_ES
dc.subjectIntraocular lenses_ES
dc.subjectOpacificationes_ES
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomographyes_ES
dc.subjectDeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectAcrysofes_ES
dc.titleComparative study of the glistening between four intraocular lens models assessed by OCT and deep learninges_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication028dac6b-dd82-408f-bc69-0a52e2340a54
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0fcd917d-245f-4650-8352-eb072b394df0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1fb98665-ea68-4cd3-a6af-83e6bb453581
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery028dac6b-dd82-408f-bc69-0a52e2340a54

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FernandezVigo_JoseIgnacio_2024_Comparative_study_glistening_4_intraocular_lens_models.pdf
Size:
322.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Manuscript