Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/26962 Sarah Kofman, Freud y lo femenino
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Posada Kubissa, María Luisa
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Posada Kubissa, L. (2019). Sarah Kofman, Freud y lo femenino. Atlánticas. Revista
Internacional de Estudios Feministas, 4 (1), 218-239. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.17979/arief.2019.4.1.3472
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Resumen] Este trabajo se propone rescatar a una pensadora contemporánea poco
(re)conocida hoy, como fue Sarah Kofman y, en particular, atender a la
relevancia de sus ajustes críticos con el discurso freudiano sobre la feminidad.
Desde una innegable afinidad intelectual con el padre del psicoanálisis, esta
pensadora analiza las quiebras de su discurso cuando se trata de conceptualizar
la femineidad, que la discípula entiende y revisa en Freud no sólo como
insuficiente, sino como expresión de un subtexto patriarcal presente ya en
filósofos tan reconocidos como Rousseau o el propio Kant. A partir de aquí, se
entrará a discutir si estas posiciones de Kofman pueden ser leídas o no en clave
de un discurso crítico-feminista.
[Abstract] This work aims to rescue a contemporary thinker not enough recognised today, as was Sarah Kofman, and in particular to focus on the relevance of her critical adjustments with the Freudian discourse on femininity. From an undeniable intellectual affinity with the father of psychoanalysis, this thinker analyzes the failures of his speech when it comes to conceptualizing femininity, which the disciple understands and revises in Freud not only as insufficient, but as an expression of a patriarchal subtext already present in philosophers as wellknown as Rousseau or Kant himself. From here, it will be discussed if these positions of Kofman can be read or not in the key of a critical-feminist discourse.
[Abstract] This work aims to rescue a contemporary thinker not enough recognised today, as was Sarah Kofman, and in particular to focus on the relevance of her critical adjustments with the Freudian discourse on femininity. From an undeniable intellectual affinity with the father of psychoanalysis, this thinker analyzes the failures of his speech when it comes to conceptualizing femininity, which the disciple understands and revises in Freud not only as insufficient, but as an expression of a patriarchal subtext already present in philosophers as wellknown as Rousseau or Kant himself. From here, it will be discussed if these positions of Kofman can be read or not in the key of a critical-feminist discourse.
Description
Editor version
Rights
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 España


