Comparison of the in vivo efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil, vancomycin and daptomycin in a murine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

UDC.coleccionInvestigaciónes_ES
UDC.departamentoFisioterapia, Medicina e Ciencias Biomédicases_ES
UDC.grupoInvInvestigación en Microbiología (INIBIC)es_ES
UDC.institutoCentroINIBIC - Instituto de Investigacións Biomédicas de A Coruñaes_ES
UDC.issue1es_ES
UDC.journalTitleInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agentses_ES
UDC.startPage106836es_ES
UDC.volume62es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorMoscoso, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorFernández-López, María del Carmen
dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Valverde, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorPérez Gómez, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorBou, Germán
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T11:10:37Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T11:10:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.descriptionShort communicationes_ES
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] The need for alternative drugs to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia has led to a focus on ceftaroline, for which clinical data remain scarce. Herein, the efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of experimental MRSA bacteraemia was compared with that of approved therapies. Five MRSA strains were tested in an immunocompetent BALB/c bacteraemia model. Serum pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline fosamil were determined using HPLC/MS Q-TOF. Two hours after infection with the MRSA strains, mice were administered 50 mg/kg of ceftaroline fosamil every 6 h, for 24 h. This regimen yielded a T>MIC of 61.5% for an MIC of 1 mg/L and proved efficacious against all strains, including an hVISA strain with non-susceptibility to daptomycin, as indicated by the reduction (mean ± s.d.) in log10 CFU/mL in blood of 2.34 ± 0.33 and log10 CFU/g in kidney of 2.08 ± 0.22. Similarly, treatment with daptomycin yielded a log reduction of 2.30 ± 0.60 in blood and 2.14 ± 0.31 in kidney. The decrease in bacterial density was less accentuated after treatment with vancomycin, which yielded 1.84 ± 0.73 and 1.95 ± 0.32 log reductions in blood and kidney, respectively. The results of the study showed that the efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil against MRSA bacteraemia in mice is not inferior to that of vancomycin and daptomycin, and indicated the potential use of ceftaroline fosamil against difficult-to-treat S. aureus bacteraemia. Considering these promising data, clinical trials should be conducted to ascertain the efficacy of the drug for treating bloodstream infections in humans.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a medical research grant of Pfizer (ID number 61003835) and CIBERINFEC. Pfizer was not involved in the design, analysis, and interpretation of data or decision to present these results. VFV is in receipt of a predoctoral fellowship from the Conselleria de Cultura, Xunta de Galicia (IN606A-36 2019/012).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipXunta de Galicia; IN606A-36 2019/012es_ES
dc.identifier.citationGarcía P, Moscoso M, Fernández MC, Fuentes-Valverde V, Pérez A, Bou G. Comparison of the in vivo efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil, vancomycin and daptomycin in a murine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Jul;62(1):106836.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106836
dc.identifier.issn0924-8579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2183/42050
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106836es_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectMRSA bacteraemiaes_ES
dc.subjectCeftaroline fosamiles_ES
dc.subjectDaptomycines_ES
dc.subjectImmunocompetent micees_ES
dc.subjectVancomycines_ES
dc.titleComparison of the in vivo efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil, vancomycin and daptomycin in a murine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemiaes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication909e08d1-6ed1-4b99-9e9e-c64eb72e7dea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery909e08d1-6ed1-4b99-9e9e-c64eb72e7dea

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Garcia_Comparision_2023.pdf
Size:
513.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: