Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/14572 La Universidad tras el proceso de Bolonia: ¿una Universidad reformada o una Universidad necesitada de reforma?
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Sendín García, Miguel Ángel
Espinosa Martín, María Teresa
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 2014, 18:525-547. ISSN: 1138-039X
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[ReSumen]: El Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES) ha supuesto un cambio radical de
las universidades en todos sus aspectos (sociales, políticos y económicos). Esos cambios han sido
potenciados y diseñados por los poderes públicos, en buena parte al margen de los problemas e
inquietudes de la Comunidad Universitaria. El resultado final es un sistema en el que se ha dado una mayor importancia a lo económico y
mercantil, reduciendo quizás en exceso otros aspectos como el formativo o social.
Se postula, por tanto, que la reforma de la educación superior lejos de verse culminada debe seguir
adelante, debiéndose enjuiciar, entre otras cosas, el acierto de alguno de los cambios y concepciones
tomadas en el EEES.
[Abstract:] The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) has brought about a radical change in its universities’ social, political and economic aspects. These changes have been promoted and designed by the government, largely disregarding the issues and concerns of the University Community. The end result is a system in which greater importance has been given to the economic and commercial issues, drastically reducing, perhaps, other important aspects such as the educational or social. We propose, therefore, that the reform of higher education, far from being culminated, must go ahead, but we should assess, among other things, the success of some of the changes and concepts taken in the EHEA.
[Abstract:] The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) has brought about a radical change in its universities’ social, political and economic aspects. These changes have been promoted and designed by the government, largely disregarding the issues and concerns of the University Community. The end result is a system in which greater importance has been given to the economic and commercial issues, drastically reducing, perhaps, other important aspects such as the educational or social. We propose, therefore, that the reform of higher education, far from being culminated, must go ahead, but we should assess, among other things, the success of some of the changes and concepts taken in the EHEA.

