Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/29784 Risks factors of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injured patients
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Trillo-Dono, Natalia
Ferreiro-Velasco, María Elena
Salvador-De la Barrera, Sebastian
Rodríguez Sotillo, Antonio
Mourelo-Fariña, Mónica
Galeiras, Rita
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Montoto-Marqués A, Trillo-Dono N, Ferreiro-Velasco ME, Salvador de la Barrera S, Rodríguez-Sotillo A, Mourelo-Fariña M. Risks factors of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(3):206-211
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract] Study design: Descriptive retrospective study.
Objectives: To analyze risk factors associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) in cases of acute traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (tCSCI).
Setting: Unidad de Lesionados Medulares, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, in Galicia (Spain).
Methods: The study included patients with tCSCI who were hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2014. The following variables were analyzed: age, gender, etiology, neurological level, ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) grade, associated injuries, injury severity score (ISS), ASIA motor score (AMS) at admission and mortality.
Results: A total of 146 patients met the study's inclusion criteria. The majority were men (74.7%) with mean age of 62.6 (s.d. ± 18.8) years. Sixty patients (41.1%) required MV. Mean age of ventilated vs. non-ventilated patients was 57.3 vs. 65.7. Men were more likely to require MV than women, ASIA grades A and B were also more likely to need MV than grades C and D, as well as patients with associated injuries. The AMS of patients receiving MV was lower than that of those who did not require MV (20.1 vs. 54.3). Moreover, the ISS was higher in patients receiving MV (31.2 vs. 13.4). An AMS ≤ 37 and an ISS ≥ 13 increased the risk of requiring MV by a factor of 11.98 and 7.28, respectively.
Conclusions: Isolated factors associated with a greater risk of MV in tCSCI were: age, gender, ASIA grade, ISS and AMS. However, the only factor with a significant discriminatory ability to determine the need for MV was the AMS at admission.
Description
Editor version
Rights
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at Springer Link.







