Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/10354 Regulación jurídica y desarrollo jurisprudencial del daño "aquiliano" en Roma. Aspectos generales de una experiencia histórica
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 2011, 15: 649-672. ISSN: 1138-039X
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Resumen] En el presente estudio, partiendo de las prescripciones contenidas en la normativa
relativa a los daños injustamente causados anterior a la Lex Aquilia de damno –plebiscito de
fecha incierta, que se suele datar sobre el año 286 a.C., y mediante el que se procedió a
unificar en su capítulo primero y tercero diversas figuras hasta entonces vigentes en torno
al delito privado de damnum iniuria datum- se pretende exponer, de forma necesariamente
sintética y desde una visión de conjunto, cuáles fueron las características estructurales
y el contenido de esta norma básica en materia de responsabilidad por daños, así como
también su posterior desarrollo interpretativo, que, como es sabido, discurrió por cauces
jurisprudenciales.
La importancia de la Ley Aquilia resulta indiscutible, puesto que la misma significa el punto
de arranque del sistema romano de responsabilidad civil, así como el referente del que, a
partir de la Jurisprudencia europea posterior, se originó el sistema moderno de la llamada
responsabilidad civil extra contractual o aquiliana.
[Abstract] The present study focuses on the prescriptions that are contained in the regulations regarding unjustly inflicted damages prior to the Lex Aquilia de damno –a plebiscite of uncertain date, that tends to be dated back to the year 286 BC, and through which various figures relating to the private offense of damnun iniuria datum, valid until then, were unified (in chapters one and three). Starting from such prescriptions, this study sets out to analyze, through an overview, the structural characteristics and content of this basic norm with respect to the issue of responsibility for damages, as well as its subsequent interpretative development –which, as it is known, was produced along jurisprudential lines. The importance of Aquilian Law is indisputable since it constitutes the foundation for the Roman system of civil responsibility, as well as the point from which, based on the subsequent European Jurisprudence, stemmed the modern system of what is known as non-contractual (or Aquilian) civil responsibility.
[Abstract] The present study focuses on the prescriptions that are contained in the regulations regarding unjustly inflicted damages prior to the Lex Aquilia de damno –a plebiscite of uncertain date, that tends to be dated back to the year 286 BC, and through which various figures relating to the private offense of damnun iniuria datum, valid until then, were unified (in chapters one and three). Starting from such prescriptions, this study sets out to analyze, through an overview, the structural characteristics and content of this basic norm with respect to the issue of responsibility for damages, as well as its subsequent interpretative development –which, as it is known, was produced along jurisprudential lines. The importance of Aquilian Law is indisputable since it constitutes the foundation for the Roman system of civil responsibility, as well as the point from which, based on the subsequent European Jurisprudence, stemmed the modern system of what is known as non-contractual (or Aquilian) civil responsibility.