Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/39961 Preliminary investigation on efficacy and safety of substance p-coated stent for promoting re-endothelialization: a porcine coronary artery restenosis model
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Park, Dae Sung
Oh, Seok
Jin, Yu Jeong
Na, Mi Hyang
Kim, Munki
Kim, Jeong Ha
Hyun, Dae Young
Cho, Kyung Hoon
Hong, Young Joon
Kim, Ju Han
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Park DS, Oh S, Jin YJ, Na MH, Kim M, Kim JH, Hyun DY, Cho KH, Hong YJ, Kim JH, Ahn Y, Hermida-Prieto M, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Mariñas-Pardo L, Lim KS, Park JK, Byeon DH, Cho YN, Kee SJ, Sim DS, Jeong MH. Preliminary investigation on efficacy and safety of substance p-coated stent for promoting re-endothelialization: a porcine coronary artery restenosis model. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024 Jan;21(1):53-64.
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Abstract] Background: Current polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) have fundamental issues about inflammation and delayed re-endothelializaton of the vessel wall. Substance-P (SP), which plays an important role in inflammation and endothelial cells, has not yet been applied to coronary stents. Therefore, this study compares poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based everolimus-eluting stents (PLGA-EESs) versus 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-based SP-eluting stents (MPC-SPs) in in-vitro and in-vivo models.
Methods: The morphology of the stent surface and peptide/drug release kinetics from stents were evaluated. The in-vitro proliferative effect of SP released from MPC-SP is evaluated using human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Finally, the safety and efficacy of the stent are evaluated after inserting it into a pig's coronary artery.
Results: Similar to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP had a uniform surface morphology with very thin coating layer thickness (2.074 μm). MPC-SP showed sustained drug release of SP for over 2 weeks. Endothelial cell proliferation was significantly increased in groups treated with SP (n = 3) compared with the control (n = 3) and those with everolimus (n = 3) (SP: 118.9 ± 7.61% vs. everolimus: 64.3 ± 12.37% vs. the control: 100 ± 6.64%, p < 0.05). In the animal study, the percent stenosis was higher in MPC-SP group (n = 7) compared to PLGA-EES group (n = 7) (MPC-SP: 28.6 ± 10.7% vs. PLGA-EES: 16.7 ± 6.3%, p < 0.05). MPC-SP group showed, however, lower inflammation (MPC-SP: 0.3 ± 0.26 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.2 ± 0.48, p < 0.05) and fibrin deposition (MPC-SP: 1.0 ± 0.73 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.5 ± 0.59, p < 0.05) around the stent strut. MPC-SP showed more increased expression of cluster of differentiation 31, suggesting enhanced re-endothelialization.
Conclusion: Compared to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP demonstrated more decreased inflammation of the vascular wall and enhanced re-endothelialization and stent coverage. Hence, MPC-SP has the potential therapeutic benefits for the treatment of coronary artery disease by solving limitations of currently available DESs.
Description
Editor version
Rights
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at Springer Link.

