Use this link to cite:
http://hdl.handle.net/2183/2468 Culpa debitoris - imposibilidad sobrevenida - perpetuatio obligationis
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Torrent, Armando
Advisors
Other responsabilities
Journal Title
Bibliographic citation
Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, 2006, 10: 1169-1194 ISSN: 1138-039X
Type of academic work
Academic degree
Abstract
[Resumen] En la estela de precedentes investigaciones en las que no había podido tener en
cuenta un reciente trabajo de Cannata sobre el argumento y en polémica con éste, mi
estudio versa sobre el tratamiento dado por los veteres a la imposibilidad sobrenida especialmente
en aquellos casos de incumplimiento por hecho imputable al deudor de una
obligatio de dare certam rem tutelados por actiones stricti iuris que para los veteres aparejaban
una perpetuatio obligationis que dejaba intacta la obligación del deudor que
negligente o intencionadamente dejaba perecer el objeto in obligatione deducta.
También discuto las opiniones doctrinales que explican que la per. oblig. es una creación
original de los veteres con la finalidad de una más efeciente protección del crédito.
[Abstract] By the way of precedents researchs and taking advantage of a recent paper of Cannata whose thesis are not for me persuasives, my subject deal with the treatment by the veteres of the supervening impossibility specially looking at the actiones stricti iuris entailing certam dare rem obligationes in cases of positive malperformances, that in the view of the veteres lay on the consideration of perpetuatio obligationis surviving the debtor’s obligation that he has negligently or intentionally remove the object when he was supposed to hand over. I discuss also the autoritatives doctrines on dogmatical and processual fiction, concluding tha the rule quotiens culpa intervenit debitoris perpetuari obligationem is an original creation of the veteres for the most efficient protection of the credit. In that context if the debtor is not able to perform, no fiction is necessary to hold de debtor liable.
[Abstract] By the way of precedents researchs and taking advantage of a recent paper of Cannata whose thesis are not for me persuasives, my subject deal with the treatment by the veteres of the supervening impossibility specially looking at the actiones stricti iuris entailing certam dare rem obligationes in cases of positive malperformances, that in the view of the veteres lay on the consideration of perpetuatio obligationis surviving the debtor’s obligation that he has negligently or intentionally remove the object when he was supposed to hand over. I discuss also the autoritatives doctrines on dogmatical and processual fiction, concluding tha the rule quotiens culpa intervenit debitoris perpetuari obligationem is an original creation of the veteres for the most efficient protection of the credit. In that context if the debtor is not able to perform, no fiction is necessary to hold de debtor liable.

