A Methodology for CFD Simulations of Floating Structures in Waves Coupled with Mooring Dynamics

UDC.coleccionInvestigación
UDC.departamentoCiencias da Computación e Tecnoloxías da Información
UDC.grupoInvGrupo Integrado de Enxeñaría (GII)
UDC.journalTitleOcean Engineering
UDC.startPage121764.
UDC.volume336
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida Medina, Tanausú
dc.contributor.authorCercos Pita, Jose Luis
dc.contributor.authorGosset, Anne
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Casás, Vicente
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-13T16:03:40Z
dc.date.available2025-10-13T16:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-01
dc.description.abstract[Abstract] Prediction of the responses in wave fields of moored floating structures, such as floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT), wave energy converters (WEC), aquaculture farms (AF), or floating breakwaters (FB), requires high-fidelity yet efficient coupled analysis between Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and mooring dynamic models. Among the coupled models available to users for the open-source CFD software OpenFOAM and mooring libraries like MoorDyn, we can find foamMooring and FloatStepper. These address issues such as added mass instability, and offer different computational methods for free-surface capturing and rigid body motion. If we also consider the various dynamic mesh techniques, users have multiple options for the general configuration of a simulation. Bearing this in mind, the present study proposes an efficient and accurate methodology for simulations with OpenFOAM coupled with the lumped-mass mooring model Moordyn for a simple floating structure, with the intention of applying it to more complex structures, or even performing survivability studies. Pursuing this goal, different dynamic mesh techniques, free-surface capturing methods and the available algorithms for rigid body motions including an added-mass correction algorithm, are investigated systematically and validated against experimental data. In the course of this work, new features have been added to the lastest version of Moordyn and also coupled with the non-iterative algorithm FloatStepper. The surface elevation, floating body motions and mooring line tensions were considered to compare the different settings. The results showed that all the tested options were accurate, but the overset technique was the most efficient in terms of computational time.
dc.identifier.citationALMEIDA-MEDINA, Tanausú, et al. A methodology for CFD simulations of floating structures in waves coupled with mooring dynamics. Ocean Engineering, 2025, vol. 336, p. 121764.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121764
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2183/45964
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121764
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectCoupled simulations
dc.subjectFloatStepper
dc.subjectFoamMooring
dc.subjectMoordyn
dc.subjectMooring dynamics
dc.subjectOpenFOAM
dc.subjectWave-structure interaction
dc.titleA Methodology for CFD Simulations of Floating Structures in Waves Coupled with Mooring Dynamics
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd8c1e0cb-7e9b-46c1-a5e6-194a2e600e4d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa3cff733-6774-4750-8f17-1e6988764059
relation.isAuthorOfPublication032fb67a-b7ec-40a9-8f9b-74744bde0a14
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd8c1e0cb-7e9b-46c1-a5e6-194a2e600e4d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AlmeidaMedina_Tanausu_2025_Methodology_Cfd_Simulations_Floating_Structures.pdf
Size:
7.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format